24/02/2022 20:20, Ajit Khaparde:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:07 AM Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> >
> > ++ adding more people here,
> >
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > 24/02/2022 10:26, Raslan Darawsheh:
> > > > This adds the syntax for E-Switch to have check on how it suppose to
> > > > be for commit
erruh.yi...@intel.com; Gal Cohen (ProdM)
> >
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtools: add E-Switch keyword for commit checks
> >
> > 24/02/2022 10:26, Raslan Darawsheh:
> > > This adds the syntax for E-Switch to have check on how it suppose to
> > > be for commits
> > [.
++ adding more people here,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:36 AM
> To: Raslan Darawsheh
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; Gal Cohen (ProdM)
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtools: add E-Switch keyword for
24/02/2022 10:26, Raslan Darawsheh:
> This adds the syntax for E-Switch to have check on how
> it suppose to be for commits
[...]
> +E-Switch
It looks Mellanox people use this syntax in Linux kernel as well.
Where does it come from? Is it a Mellanox-only wording?
Intuitively, I would have written
This adds the syntax for E-Switch to have check on how
it suppose to be for commits
Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh
---
devtools/words-case.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/devtools/words-case.txt b/devtools/words-case.txt
index bc33470532..1146706e54 100644
--- a/devtools
5 matches
Mail list logo