On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:15 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> Rather than explicitly clearing any setting of undefined values in our
> rte_config.h file, it's better to instead just add a comment that the
> value is not set. Using a comment allows the user to set the value using
> CFLAGS or similar
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:20:04PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:37 PM Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> > > I'd like a check like (below), to avoid new additions:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/devtools/checkpatches.sh b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > > index 34a2e43845..8dae47165e 1
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:54:33AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:14:30AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Rather than explicitly clearing any setting of undefined values in our
> > rte_config.h file, it's better to instead just add a comment that the
> > value is not
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:37 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> > I'd like a check like (below), to avoid new additions:
> >
> > diff --git a/devtools/checkpatches.sh b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > index 34a2e43845..8dae47165e 100755
> > --- a/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > +++ b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 02:26:14PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:54 AM Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:14:30AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > Rather than explicitly clearing any setting of undefined values in our
> > > rte_config.h file, i
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:54 AM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:14:30AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Rather than explicitly clearing any setting of undefined values in our
> > rte_config.h file, it's better to instead just add a comment that the
> > value is not set. Us
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, 13 June 2022 11.55
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: david.march...@redhat.com; junx.d...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: remove explicit undef of unset values
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:14:30AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Rather than explicitly clearing any setting of undefined values in our
> rte_config.h file, it's better to instead just add a comment that the
> value is not set. Using a comment allows the user to set the value using
> CFLAGS or s
Rather than explicitly clearing any setting of undefined values in our
rte_config.h file, it's better to instead just add a comment that the
value is not set. Using a comment allows the user to set the value using
CFLAGS or similar mechanism without the config file clearing the value
again.
The te
9 matches
Mail list logo