Re: [PATCH] common/sfc_efx/base: support link status change v2 events

2023-04-07 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 3/30/2023 8:16 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 3/28/23 19:51, Ivan Malov wrote: >> FW should send link status change events in either v1 or >> v2 format depending on the preference which the driver >> can express during CMD_DRV_ATTACH stage. At the moment, >> libefx does not request v2, so v1 e

Re: [PATCH] common/sfc_efx/base: support link status change v2 events

2023-03-30 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 3/28/23 19:51, Ivan Malov wrote: FW should send link status change events in either v1 or v2 format depending on the preference which the driver can express during CMD_DRV_ATTACH stage. At the moment, libefx does not request v2, so v1 events must arrive. However, FW does not honour this choice

[PATCH] common/sfc_efx/base: support link status change v2 events

2023-03-28 Thread Ivan Malov
FW should send link status change events in either v1 or v2 format depending on the preference which the driver can express during CMD_DRV_ATTACH stage. At the moment, libefx does not request v2, so v1 events must arrive. However, FW does not honour this choice and always sends v2 events. So teach