RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next operation

> -Original Message- > From: Anoob Joseph > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 11:43 PM > To: Suanming Mou > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ciara Power > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next > operation > > Hi Suanming, > &g

RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next operation

Hi Suanming, Please see inline. Thanks, Anoob > -Original Message- > From: Suanming Mou > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 6:06 PM > To: Anoob Joseph > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ciara Power > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next &

RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next operation

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Anoob Joseph > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 7:22 PM > To: Suanming Mou > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ciara Power > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next > operation > > Hi Suanming, > &

RE: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next operation

Hi Suanming, Good catch. Please see inline. Thanks, Anoob > -Original Message- > From: Suanming Mou > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 9:24 AM > To: Ciara Power > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next operation &

[PATCH] app/test-crypto-perf: fix invalid mbuf next operation

In fill_multi_seg_mbuf(), when remaining_segments is 0, rte_mbuf m's next should pointer to NULL instead of a new rte_mbuf, that casues setting m->next as NULL out of the while loop to the invalid mbuf. This commit fixes the invalid mbuf next operation. Fixes: bf9d6702eca9 ("app/crypto-perf: use