09/02/2024 12:30, Amit Prakash Shukla:
>
>
> > > >
> > > > invoke (*dev->dev_ops->dma_adapter_vchan_add)(dev, dma_dev_id,
> > > > vchan, event),
> > > >
> > > > at cnxk driver, this ops will check whether the DMA is
> > > > cnxk_dmadev_pci_driver.
> > > >
> > > > I think this is because the cnxk'
> > >
> > > invoke (*dev->dev_ops->dma_adapter_vchan_add)(dev, dma_dev_id,
> > > vchan, event),
> > >
> > > at cnxk driver, this ops will check whether the DMA is
> > > cnxk_dmadev_pci_driver.
> > >
> > > I think this is because the cnxk's event-and-dma implement has deep
> > > coupling
> > >
>
09/02/2024 12:05, Amit Prakash Shukla:
> > On 2024/2/9 0:25, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/12/2023 12:00, Amit Prakash Shukla:
> > >> +struct rte_dma_dev *
> > >> +rte_dma_pmd_get_dev_by_id(const int dev_id)
> > > const does not make sense here for an int parameter.
> >
> >
> > I think it could
Hi Thomas and Chengwen,
Thank you for the review and feedback. Please find my comment in-line.
Thanks,
Amit Shukla
> --
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
> On 2024/2/9 0:25, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 19/12/2023 12:00, Amit Prakash Shukla:
> >
4 matches
Mail list logo
