> As 1.x is for linux/freebsd, but 2.0 is for solaris, 2.0 doesn't
> leverage the messages from 1.x. For example, 0x0a has different
> meaning in 1.x and 2.0. So better letting it be.
>
Ok, thanks for your reply.
>
> Thanks for contributing code. But there are 2 problems here.
>
> 1. You are modifying base code under 'base' directory. It assumed
> READ ONLY because
> there is another Intel team are maintaining it.
> 2. Without your change, the code won't have any negative effect.
> Yes, I appreciate
2 matches
Mail list logo
