Hi
I am trying to run DPDK 2.2 example application "l2fwd" with valgrind and
run in to the "Segment Sanity check failed" error.
I tried with standard valgrind-3.10 and the modified one (
https://github.com/bisdn/valgrind-hugepages) and run in to the same issue
Does anyone has any suggestions?
Fol
Hi
I am running a DPDK application with virtio driver and ran in to driver rx
lockup issue.
The application seems to be running fine for couple of hours before it
stops receiving packets on the interface. Transmission of packets seems to
work fine on the same interface while reception of packets st
Hi
I am using DPDK QoS and I find something strange. I am not sure if
something is wrong with my config or my understanding of queue weights is
wrong.
In my config, I am using only 1 port and 1 subport and 1 pipe. Within that
pipe, I am using only the last class (C3). Port, subport and pipe are
co
Hi
Can someone throw some light on the following DPDK QoS config variables?
A) In struct *rte_sched_subport_params* AND *rte_sched_pipe_params*
1) tb_rate - Is the provisioned rate at which the TB can be filled while
enqueuing OR the TB rate slice allotted to this subport ?
2) tb_size
3)
24, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Dumitrescu, Cristian <
cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sreenaath vasudevan [mailto:sreenaathkv at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:55 AM
> *To:* Dumitrescu, Cristian
> *Cc:* dev at dpdk.org
>
t 7:02 AM, Dumitrescu, Cristian <
cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sreenaath vasudevan [mailto:sreenaathkv at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:01 PM
> *To:* Dumitrescu, Cristian
> *Cc:* dev at dpdk.org
> *Subject:*
--
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of sreenaath
> > vasudevan
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 9:09 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS - link sharing across classes
> >
> > Hi
> > I currently have Q
Hi
I currently have QoS implemented in hardware and I am thinking of using
DPDK's QoS feature to move it to software.
Currently in the hardware,Based on the 4 class per pipe and 4 queues per
class limitation, I was thinking of using 4 classes in DPDK-QoS and spread
out the 8 h/w queues across the 4
8 matches
Mail list logo