[dpdk-dev] Valgrind with DPDK - Error in "EAL: Segment sanity check failed"

2017-11-03 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
Hi I am trying to run DPDK 2.2 example application "l2fwd" with valgrind and run in to the "Segment Sanity check failed" error. I tried with standard valgrind-3.10 and the modified one ( https://github.com/bisdn/valgrind-hugepages) and run in to the same issue Does anyone has any suggestions? Fol

[dpdk-dev] Virtio driver lockup in KVM

2016-12-19 Thread Sreenaath Vasudevan
Hi I am running a DPDK application with virtio driver and ran in to driver rx lockup issue. The application seems to be running fine for couple of hours before it stops receiving packets on the interface. Transmission of packets seems to work fine on the same interface while reception of packets st

[dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS- Using un-used bandwidth within a class

2016-10-24 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
Hi I am using DPDK QoS and I find something strange. I am not sure if something is wrong with my config or my understanding of queue weights is wrong. In my config, I am using only 1 port and 1 subport and 1 pipe. Within that pipe, I am using only the last class (C3). Port, subport and pipe are co

[dpdk-dev] QoS config variables

2016-07-08 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
Hi Can someone throw some light on the following DPDK QoS config variables? A) In struct *rte_sched_subport_params* AND *rte_sched_pipe_params* 1) tb_rate - Is the provisioned rate at which the TB can be filled while enqueuing OR the TB rate slice allotted to this subport ? 2) tb_size 3)

[dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS - link sharing across classes

2016-02-24 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
24, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Dumitrescu, Cristian < cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> wrote: > > > > > *From:* sreenaath vasudevan [mailto:sreenaathkv at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:55 AM > *To:* Dumitrescu, Cristian > *Cc:* dev at dpdk.org >

[dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS - link sharing across classes

2016-02-23 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
t 7:02 AM, Dumitrescu, Cristian < cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> wrote: > > > > > *From:* sreenaath vasudevan [mailto:sreenaathkv at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:01 PM > *To:* Dumitrescu, Cristian > *Cc:* dev at dpdk.org > *Subject:*

[dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS - link sharing across classes

2016-02-18 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
-- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of sreenaath > > vasudevan > > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 9:09 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS - link sharing across classes > > > > Hi > > I currently have Q

[dpdk-dev] DPDK-QoS - link sharing across classes

2016-02-02 Thread sreenaath vasudevan
Hi I currently have QoS implemented in hardware and I am thinking of using DPDK's QoS feature to move it to software. Currently in the hardware,Based on the 4 class per pipe and 4 queues per class limitation, I was thinking of using 4 classes in DPDK-QoS and spread out the 8 h/w queues across the 4