it seems your patch is later then mine?
you rejected mine patch and then committed yours?
I can't understand
--origin--
from:Burakov,Anatoly
to:David Marchand ;
copy:han.li1;Thomas Monjalon ;dev ;
date :2019/10/24 20:39
title :Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] lib/l
I didn't modified the attach function,I modified the rte_eal_config_create.
primay process first mmap's address, use a lower address, to avoid
secondary process mmap the fixed address fail. the secondary still
mmap the same address as the primary.
dpdk do the same thing in rte_fbar
Hi,
below is maintainer's suggestion,and I think it's ok to do these changes?
> -Original Message-> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf
> Of Li HanTo avoid typecast below , please use uint64_t for enabled_port_mask.
> So change below function return type to uint64_t> -stat
3 matches
Mail list logo