Hi,
When I enable the Tx offloads capabilities, I get the segmentation fault.
The backtrace like this:
lcore_main_loop
--> main_loop_tx
--> rte_eth_tx_burst
--> eth_igb_xmit_pkts
--> rte_pktmbuf_free_seg
Hi,
I test the performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd, and get the conclusion is:
l2fwd is three times better than test-pipeline, that confused me.
In principle it should be test-pipeline is better than l2fwd?
Anyone can tell me the reason, thank you in advance.
Hi,
I tested the performance of "test-pipeline"(--none) and "l2fwd", but the result
confused me.
"l2fwd" was three times better than "test-pipeline" in pps.
I set them to the same parameters like this:
"l2fwd":
MAX_PKT_BURST=64
nb_rxd = 1024
nb_txd = 1024
"test-pipeline"
burst_size_rx_read
Thank your answers, that helped me out.
-- --
??: "Shyam Shrivastav";
: 2018??12??6??(??) 2:22
??????: "bai bakari"<912873...@qq.com>;
: "dev";
: Re: [dpdk-dev] About the data payload
hen i use dpdk-pktgen, that if can promise
its type is IPv4?
-- Original --
From: "Varghese, Vipin";
Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2018 12:20 PM
To: "bai bakari"<912873...@qq.com>;"dev";
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] About the data payload of
Hi,
Now, I want to get the data payload of rte_mbuf, and i wrote the following code:
struct ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
struct tcp_hdr *tcp_hdr;
uint32_t payload_len, ip_len;
uint8_t *payload = NULL;
ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, struct ipv4_hdr *, sizeof(struct
ether_hdr));
ip_len = ntohs(
OK, thank you very much!
-- Original --
From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian";
Date: Tue, Nov 27, 2018 05:49 AM
To: "bai bakari"<912873...@qq.com>;"dev";
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] About the LRU Cache based DPDK?
> -Origin
Hi all,
I'm going to implement a LRU Cache based DPDK.
The most famous implementation of LRU is based on LinkedHashMap.
I know that DPDK has a `rte_hash` library, but I don't know whether
it can assist me to build a LRU Cache.
Can someone give me some advice? Thanks a lot in advance.
8 matches
Mail list logo