Hi,
Do we have assumption each core will have a separate crypto device?
I have only one crypto device with several queues which are shared by
multi-cores.
As I run the l2fwd-crypto, only one cparam is valid and has a good dev_id.
The other cparam is crashing.
The reason is the other qconf a
Hi Thomas & Konstantin,
Thanks for the review and the comments are addressed by
http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6653/
Best Regards,
Xuelin Shi
> -Origina Konstantin l Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.ananyev at intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, Jul
Hi Thomas,
I have worked out the new version based on dpdk v2 codebase to address the
comments.
http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6449/
thanks,
Xuelin Shi
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 10
Hi,
OK, I'm fine to defer it.
Thanks,
Xuelin Shi
> -Original Message-
> From: Butler, Siobhan A [mailto:siobhan.a.butler at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 04:18
> To: Shi Xuelin-B29237; Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev
gt; To: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xuelin Shi
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: fix ixgbe access endian issue on
> > bigendian arch
> >
> > From: Xuelin Shi
> >
> > enforce rules of the cpu and ixgbe exchange data.
&g
Hi Thomas,
Done. http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4123/
Thanks,
Xuelin Shi
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 22:02
> To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; konstantin.anany
Hi Thomas,
Done. http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4122/
Thanks,
Xuelin Shi
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 22:04
> To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
> Cc: Bruce Richardson; dev at dpdk.or
dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_lpm: define tbl entry reversely
> for big endian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xuelin Shi
> > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 1:54 AM
> > To: Richardson, Bruce
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
on at 6wind.com; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] librte_lpm: define tbl entry reversely for big
> endian
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:12:12AM +, Xuelin Shi wrote:
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Yes, it needs to swap the fields. The bit field is first identified as
-B29237
> Cc: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] librte_lpm: define tbl entry reversely for big
> endian
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:34:12PM +0800, xuelin.shi at freescale.com wrote:
> > From: Xuelin Shi
> >
> > This module uses typ
1, 2015 at 02:12:59PM +0800, xuelin.shi at freescale.com wrote:
> > From: Xuelin Shi
> >
> > struct tbl_entry{
> > uint8_t next_hop;
> > uint8_t valid :1;
> > uint8_t valid_group :1;
> > uint8_t depth :6
> > }
> >
Hi Olivier,
Would you please help to review the bottom patch?
Thanks,
Shi Xuelin
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xuelin Shi
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 17:27
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] fix testpmd show port info
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 14:52
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Subject: [PATCH] fix testpmd show port info error
From: Xuelin Shi
the port number type should be consistent with librte_cmdline, else there is
potential endian issue.
Signed-off-by: Xuelin Shi
---
app/test-pmd/cmdl
13 matches
Mail list logo
