t;
> > On Tue, 24 May 2022 22:46:05 -0700
> > Subendu Santra wrote:
> >
> > > Show all non-owned ports when no port mask is specified
> > >
> > > show-port option without the mask option, displays only the last
> > > non-owned port. Show all
I have updated the v2 of the patch with the explanation.
Kindly advise if it looks ok.
Regards,
Subendu.
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:22 AM Subendu Santra wrote:
>
> Show all non-owned ports when no port mask is specified
>
> show-port option without the mask option, displays only th
rg
Signed-off-by: Subendu Santra
---
app/proc-info/main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/proc-info/main.c b/app/proc-info/main.c
index 56070a3317..2be24b584e 100644
--- a/app/proc-info/main.c
+++ b/app/proc-info/main.c
@@ -1504,10 +1504,10 @@ main(int
rg
Signed-off-by: Subendu Santra
---
app/proc-info/main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/proc-info/main.c b/app/proc-info/main.c
index 56070a3317..2be24b584e 100644
--- a/app/proc-info/main.c
+++ b/app/proc-info/main.c
@@ -1504,10 +1504,10 @@ main(int
lon wrote:
>
> 23/05/2022 12:53, Subendu Santra:
> > Hi Reshma, Thomas,
> >
> > What do you think about this patch?
>
> It looks to be a fix, right?
> Please add a sentence about the previous behaviour,
> explaining what is fixed.
>
> Ideally you should show t
Hi Reshma, Thomas,
What do you think about this patch?
Regards,
Subendu.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:52 PM Subendu Santra wrote:
>
> Show all non-owned ports when no port mask is specified
>
> Fixes: 1dd6cffb6571 ("app/procinfo: provide way to request info on owned
>
Agreed. I will change it to uint64_t and send it for review.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Subendu.
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:32 AM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 14:39:05 +0530
> Subendu Santra wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephen, Thomas,
> >
> > O
Show all non-owned ports when no port mask is specified
Fixes: 1dd6cffb6571 ("app/procinfo: provide way to request info on owned
ports")
Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
Signed-off-by: Subendu Santra
---
app/proc-info/main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
di
rm it runs on.
Kindly share your thoughts on this.
Regards,
Subendu.
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:18 PM Stephen Hemminger <
step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2022 10:47:58 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 24/04/2022 07:34, Subendu Santra:
> > &g
Hi Stephen,
Could you please help us understand the rationale behind showing just the
last non-owned port in case the port mask was not specified?
I really appreciate your help in this regard.
Regards,
Subendu.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:04 AM Subendu Santra wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>
Hi Stephen,
We were going through the patch set:
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20200715212228.28010-7-step...@networkplumber.org/
and hoping to get clarification on the behaviour if post mask is not specified
in the input to `dpdk-proc-info` tool.
Specifically, In PATCH v3 6/7, we see this:
+
11 matches
Mail list logo