num_route_entries need to be reseted.
Fixes: 17d60f5b5eea ("app/test: remove large IPv4 LPM data file")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
---
app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 608e17
num_route_entries need to be reseted.
V2 : resubmitting the patch with a signed-off
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
---
app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 608e17a..e7e1281 100644
--- a/app/test
num_route_entries need to be reseted.
---
app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index 608e17a..e7e1281 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static void gen
On 09/21/2016 19:29, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:11:04PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> Please, will you help reviewing this patch?
> Sure.
Sorry for being late to reply, I was a bit busy.
>
> 1. It adds a dependency on libbsd on Linux: bsd/sys/tree.h. Is this an
> expecte
On 09/19/2016 22:04, Shyam Sundar Govindaraj wrote:
> Hi
>
> In IPv4 lpm implementation, the next hop size is increased from 8-bit to
> 24-bit. Is there a plan to increase IPv6 lpm next hop size?
>
> Also, next hop size in this document needs to be updated, since it is not 1
> byte anymore.
> htt
On 08/25/2016 00:59, Nikita Kozlov wrote:
> This serie of pathes focus on improving the speed of deleting rules in lpm6.
>
> It also contains some other improvement like having a dynamic number of
> rules in lpm6 and increasing the lpm6 nexthop size to 16bit for matching
> the nexth
Modify of test_lpm6.c to reflect that we no longer have a maximum number
of rules.
Check in some places that we are using the same number of tbl8 as the
previous implementation after a rte_lpm6_delete.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
Signed-off-by: Baptiste Daroussin
---
app/test/test_lpm6.c
written in collaboration with Baptiste Daroussin from Gandi.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
Signed-off-by: Baptiste Daroussin
---
lib/librte_lpm/Makefile| 2 +-
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.c | 626 +++--
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.h | 50
same test.
This patch was written in collaboration with Baptiste Daroussin from Gandi.
Changes since V1:
- use system bsd-tree.h
- fix a bug when valid_group field was overwritten
Nikita Kozlov (2):
lpm6: speed inmprovement on delete rule
test_lpm6: make test_lpm6* compatible with the new
Change the lpm perf autotest to use the routes data from the resource data
stored in the binary rather than including it directly into the C file
as a C header. This speeds up compile and link time, without changing
the test results.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
Change the lpm autotest to use the routes data from the resource data
stored in the binary rather than including it directly into the C file
as a C header. This speeds up compile and link time, without changing
the test results.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
Change the file extension of the test_lpm_routes file from .h to .dat.
This makes the lines-of-code counts for DPDK more realistic as they are not
affected by the huge counts from the lpm data.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
---
app/test/Makefile
The one route that was different to the others in the test_lpm_routes.h
file was the entry "{0, 8}" which was the only route without a "U" after
the IP part. Add in the extra "U" to that entry so that it can be used
as a check character when parsing routes manually.
%)
python:1800 (0.34%)
sh:1341 (0.25%)
generated using David A. Wheeler's 'SLOCCount'
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-April/038145.html
Nikita Kozlov (4):
test: make all lpm routes be of unsigned type
test: change lpm routes file from header to data file
On 06/ 9/16 02:58 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 02:53:53 +0200
> Nikita Kozlov wrote:
>
>> This structure is used inside the rte_lpm6 lib for storing added rules.
>> It's imported from FreeBSD-10.3 from /usr/include/sys/tree.h, another
>> so
Modify of test_lpm6.c to reflect that we no longer have a maximum number
of rules.
Check in some places that we are using the same number of tbl8 as the
previous implementation after a rte_lpm6_delete.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
---
app/test/test_lpm6.c | 131
This structure is used inside the rte_lpm6 lib for storing added rules.
It's imported from FreeBSD-10.3 from /usr/include/sys/tree.h, another
solution could have been to use on Linux the version from libbsd but it
would create an external dependency.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
---
written in collaboration with Baptiste Daroussin from Gandi.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
---
lib/librte_lpm/Makefile| 2 +-
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.c | 576 ++---
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm6.h | 49 +++-
lib/librte_lpm
same test.
This patch was written in collaboration with Baptiste Daroussin from Gandi.
Nikita Kozlov (3):
lpm6 speed inmprovement on delete rule
librte_eal: Import FreeBSD sys/tree.h into librte_eal/common
test_lpm6: make test_lpm6* compatible with the new rte_lpm6.c lib
app/test
Hello,
On 09/ 1/15 07:34 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz at cloudius-systems.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:42 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Zhang, Helin; Ananyev, Konstantin; avi at cloudius-systems.com; Vlad
>> Zolotarov
>>
On 10/30/2015 11:25 PM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:55:16PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> We'll see what we can do in 2.3 timeframe.
> Thanks for taking all of this up and helping us make a solid plan. I'll do my
> best to help out from the community side. I have done some
Hello,
We have opensourced our dpdk-based project, Packet Journey
https://github.com/Gandi/packet-journey .
Packet Journey is a combinationof Linux RT_NETLINK and severalparts
ofDPDK (rte_kni, rte_lpm, rte_acl, rte_cmdline) and is intended to
serveas an edge router.
Our use case is:
- pktj start
On 10/28/2015 03:40 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:44:15AM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote:
>> Fix two issues in the delete_depth_small() function.
>>
>> 1> The control is not strict in this function.
>>
>> In the following structure,
>> struct rte_lpm_tbl24_entry {
>>
On 09/02/2015 03:49 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We?re looking at packaging DPDK in Ubuntu. We?d like to discuss upstream
> changes to better integrate DPDK into Linux distributions.
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robie
Hello,
For your interest, we have also done some kind of packaging of dpdk for
debi
This option permit to build librte_kni.so without building rte_kni.ko so
you can build a sdk without building kernel drivers.
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kozlov
---
config/common_linuxapp | 1 +
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/Makefile | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Hello,
To introduce myself, I am working on a slightly enhanced version of
l3fwd which support some more features like dynamically adding new
routes in a lpm table, adding some acls, rate-limiting per dest, a
command line through unixsock etc. We hope to open source it as soon as
it is shiny enoug
26 matches
Mail list logo
