[dpdk-dev] issues with packets bigger than 1500 bytes

uf_free(). Application is also stable with packets larger than 1500 bytes and standard MTU, but as I said, there are a lot of received errors. BR, Newman On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:52:22PM +0200, Newman Poborsky wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having some problems with dpdk on links that have

[dpdk-dev] issues with packets bigger than 1500 bytes

Hi, I'm having some problems with dpdk on links that have packets bigger than 1500bytes. Some packets that are receieved are around 4K, and some are 9k jumbo frames. When using testpmd app, I can see a lot of RX-errors (both RX-missed and RX-badlen). When I set max packet length to 9000, RX-badl

[dpdk-dev] rte_mempool_create fails with ENOMEM

ation so that there aren't enough contiguous segments? If so, how? Thanks! Newman On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Newman Poborsky wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: >> You can reserve hugepages on the kernel cmdline (GRUB). > > Grea

[dpdk-dev] rte_mempool_create fails with ENOMEM

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > You can reserve hugepages on the kernel cmdline (GRUB). Great, thanks, I'll try that! Newman > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Newman Poborsky > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at

[dpdk-dev] rte_mempool_create fails with ENOMEM

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin < konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin > > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:43 PM > >

[dpdk-dev] rte_mempool_create fails with ENOMEM

Hi, could someone please provide any explanation why sometimes mempool creation fails with ENOMEM? I run my test app several times without any problems and then I start getting ENOMEM error when creating mempool that are used for packets. I try to delete everything from /mnt/huge, I increase the

[dpdk-dev] one worker reading multiple ports

5PM +0100, Newman Poborsky wrote: > > So, since mempool is multi-consumer (by default), if one is used to > > configure queues on multiple NICs that have different socket owners, then > > mbuf allocation will fail? But if 2 NICs have the socket owner, > everything > > should

[dpdk-dev] one worker reading multiple ports

ool? Thank you, Newman On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:10:51PM +0100, Newman Poborsky wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. > > > > I just realized that the reason the rte_eth_rx_burst() returns 0 is > because > >

[dpdk-dev] one worker reading multiple ports

ote: > Hi Newman, > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Newman Poborsky > > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 8:34 AM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] one worker reading multiple ports > &

[dpdk-dev] one worker reading multiple ports

Hi, is it possible to use one worker thread (one lcore) to read packets from multiple ports? When I start 2 workers and assign each one to read from different ports (with rte_eth_rx_burst()) everything works fine, but if I assign one worker to read packets from 2 ports, rte_eth_rx_burst() retur

[dpdk-dev] building shared library

an On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:26:04PM +, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Newman Poborsky > > > Se

[dpdk-dev] building shared library

efore main(). How? BR, Newman On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Newman Poborsky wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > no, that sounds good, thank you. Since I'm not that familiar with DPDK > build system, where should this option be set? In 'lib' folder's Makefile? > > Th

[dpdk-dev] building shared library

roy at intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Newman Poborsky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to build one .so file with my app (it contains API that I want to > > call through JNI) and all DPDK libs that I use in my app. > > > > A

[dpdk-dev] building shared library

; Hi Newman, > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Newman Poborsky > > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 2:23 PM > > > > Hi, > > > > is it possible to build a dpdk app as a shared library? > > > > I tried to put 'include

[dpdk-dev] building shared library

nsn.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am using DPDK based shared lib, but never met such problems. Can you > please share this the result of "ldd x.so" and check if all those > depended lib are all avalible? > > brgs, > chi xiaobo > > -Original Message----- >

[dpdk-dev] building shared library

Hi, is it possible to build a dpdk app as a shared library? I tried to put 'include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.extshared.mk' in my Makefile (and define SHARED) and it builds .so lib, but all rte_* symbols are undefined. After that i tried adding: LDLIBS += -lrte_eal -lrte_mbuf -lrte_cmdline -lrte_timer

[dpdk-dev] flow director - perfect match filter

ady classify you packet as TCP one. > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Newman Poborsky > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:18 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] flow director - perfect match filter > >

[dpdk-dev] flow director - perfect match filter

Hi, I'm not sure this is the right place to post a question like this, but I've been stuck with the same problem for days now. I'm trying to use flow director perfect match filters and so far I haven't been able to get it working. I have tried writing my own simple app (based on given examples) a