Re: [dpdk-dev] [oss-security] DPDK security advisory for multiple vhost crypto issues

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:29 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 1/4/2021 8:28 AM, Mauro Matteo Cascella wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there any particular reason for the Scope metric to be Unchanged > > (S:U) for CVE-2020-14377 and CVE-2020-14378? > > > > re

Re: [dpdk-dev] [oss-security] DPDK security advisory for multiple vhost crypto issues

dpdk-stable/commit/?h=19.11&id=81e969483020 > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=19.11&id=e4a7c14f0248 > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=19.11&id=319b498e4b16 > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=19.11&id=6a3a414698e4 > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=19.11&id=e2666ec24535 > > -- > DPDK Security Team > http://core.dpdk.org/security/ > > > > > > > > -- Mauro Matteo Cascella Red Hat Product Security PGP-Key ID: BB3410B0

[dpdk-dev] FW: Issues on FDIR and multi-processes

after the "rte_eal_init" call in my main function. I still have the same problem whit the secondary processes. Do you think there could be other issues with the secondary-processes on the some core? Did I do something wrong in the _lcore_id setting? Regards. Mauro > From: b

[dpdk-dev] Issues on FDIR and multi-processes

r? Is it a DPDK limitation or a FDIR limitation? Best regards. Mauro

[dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support

s it right? Is it true also if I disable the mempool per-core cache? Thanks for your help, regards. Mauro > From: bruce.richardson at intel.com > To: mauroannarumma at hotmail.it; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support > Date: Mon, 17 F

[dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support

ual to the number of my CPU logical cores? In the case I run 2 mono-lcore DPDK processes with the same coremask, what are the possible issues? 2) Can a secondary process use the rte_eth_rx_burst over a queue of a NIC port configured in the primary process? Regards, Mauro

[dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

nd 82599. Now I'm testing if the FDIR really works properly also on the X540 ; if it works, I will provide a patch. Best Regards, Mauro > From: bruce.richardson at intel.com > To: mauroannarumma at hotmail.it; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director support

[dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?

Hi, I'm trying to use Flow Director. Initially I used a X540 chipset and I was not able to make it work; I thought it was a compatibility problem with the controller. Maxime suggested to change some lines in the ixgbe_fdir.c file, I changed these lines but it did not give the expected resu

[dpdk-dev] Question on VMDq mode

pport the FDIR_MODE_SIGNATURE). Regards, Mauro > Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:28:39 +0100 > From: mauroannarumma at hotmail.it > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Question on VMDq mode > > Hi, > I'm trying to use the VMDq technology for pre-filter packets on the &

[dpdk-dev] Question on VMDq mode

ction *rte_eth_dev_mac_addr_add*, which requires the parameter *uint32_t pool* (VMDq pool index to associate address with (if VMDq is enabled)). My questions are: 1) Am I on the right way to achieve my goal? 2) How is it realized the mapping pools/queues? Regards, Mauro