Hi all,
Maybe this is a silly question, please bear with me.
According to the “Getting Started Guide for Linux” in
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.html,
the kernel version should be >= 3.2.
Accrding to my understanding, there are only two kernel modules in DPDK,
namely rte_kni.ko and
Hi dpdk-dev,
Shouldn't rte_pci_ioport_unmap() be deprecated ?
No one calls this methods, still I did not find deprecation notice anywhere.
Regards,
Kevin
Hi, Anatoly,
Thanks for these patches, good work.
Regarding "update-grub": IIRC, this is Ubuntu specific command (and
also used in Debian/Debian based flavors).
In Fedora (RedHat based) recent distros, you use grub2-mkconfig
instead (and there is no "update-grub", IIRC).
If this is true, I would c
Hi,
According to what I understand from:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/eventdevs/index.html
only 3 drivers currently use the eventdev API,
NXP DPAA,NXP DPAA2 and Octeon SSOVF.
My question is: is there any HW requirements from a NIC
so that it will use the eventdev API for RX/TX instead
of the tradit
Hi,
Is it possible to configure dpdk-pktgen so that it will start only
transmitting packets, without Rx mode ?
I could not find a way to achieve it.
More specifically, I mean starting dpdk-pktgen so that it won't call
rte_eth_rx_burst() ?
(rte_eth_rx_burst() is called from pktgen_main_receive()
back
when the required modules specified in the RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP()
macro were not found ?
Regards,
KW
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 25/05/2018 11:55, Kevin Wilson:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am facing the following issue in DPDK 18.05-rc5 (I saw
Hi,
I am facing the following issue in DPDK 18.05-rc5 (I saw it also with earlier
releases of DPDK from the last year). The issue is with defining
dependency on a kernel module in a PMD.
I want to develop a PMD which requiers that before running DPDK app which
uses this PMD, a specified kernel mod
e
used to carry network packets."
...
...
and of course also confusing those who delve into the code.
Regards,
KW
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:51:51 +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>> Hello,
>> With the most recent mast
Hello,
With the most recent master tree we have:
git grep rte_ctrlmbuf_init
doc/guides/prog_guide/mbuf_lib.rst:The rte_pktmbuf_init() and
rte_ctrlmbuf_init() functions initialize some fields in the mbuf
structure that
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c:rte_ctrlmbuf_init(struct rte_mempool *mp,
lib/librte
Hi Mauricio,
Thanks!
>be sure that kvm is enabled by
> setting "accel=kvm" in the qemu command line.
Isn't "--enable-kvm" intended for that ?
Kevin
Hi,
I am trying to use DPDK SRIOV passthrough with DPDK on Intel NICs.
I am following the instructions in "Network Interface Controller Drivers", in
http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/pdf-guides/nics-16.07.pdf
I saw in "11.2 Setting Up a KVM Virtual Machine Monitor" in this pdf
that it says to
download qem
Hello,
I had tried to build the connectx-3 driver with latest git tree and
it fails with
...
...
== Build drivers/net/mlx4
CC mlx4.o
/work/down/temp/dpdk/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c: In function ?txq_cleanup?:
/work/down/temp/dpdk/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c:1106:37: error: storage
size of ?params? is
Hi,
I am getting the following error while running testpmd:
RING: Cannot reserve memory
EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
Cause: Creation of mbuf pool for socket 0 failed
I am running it thus:
build/app/testpmd --log-level 8 -c7 -n3 -- \
-i --nb-cores=2 --nb-ports=2 --pkt-filter-mode=
Hi,
I have downloaded dpdk-2.0.0.tar.gz from dpdk.org
How do I build the documentation (pdf files)?
Regards,
Kevin
here on the dpdk.org page.
>
>
> Tim
>
>> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
>>
>> Hi,
>> >I'll post a recording of it soon.
>> Great idea! most welcomed!
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3
Hi,
>I'll post a recording of it soon.
Great idea! most welcomed!
Kevin
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:13 PM, O'driscoll, Tim
wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
>> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
>> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' t
Hi, Tim,
> We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?
Kevin
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:36 PM, O'driscoll, Tim
wrote:
> Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people found
> it useful.
>
> We'll schedule a
Poke!
Can anybody advice about this question ?
Kevin
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking in the file hierarchy of dpdk, and I see that under
> /dpdk-1.7.1/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/ethtool
> we have:
> igb ixgbe README
>
> My
Hi,
I am looking in the file hierarchy of dpdk, and I see that under
/dpdk-1.7.1/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/ethtool
we have:
igb ixgbe README
My question is: why the igb and ixgbe are on this path, under ethtool
? are they related
to ethtool in any way ?
The README does not explain it.
Rega
19 matches
Mail list logo
