Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] Wind River Systems AVP PMD vs virtio? - ivshmem is back

2017-03-20 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
If AVP was an upstream device of Qemu or Linux kernel that would be very natural to have a DPDK PMD (setting aside my comments on a preferred single virtual device). As far as I know this is not the case. Because of that, one could see the AVP PMD as a way to leverage open source to promote pr

[dpdk-dev] [virtio] virtio-net PMD cannot be used on Ubuntu 16.10

2016-11-24 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
Hello, While I (almost) never had a problem with testpmd, Ubuntu 16.10 make it fail: $ sudo ./testpmd -c 0x3 -n1 --no-huge -- --disable-hw-vlan --disable-rss -i --rxq=1 --txq=1 --rxd=256 --txd=256 EAL: Detected 4 lcore(s) EAL: Probing VFIO support... EAL: WARNING: cpu flags constant_tsc=yes nons

[dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation

2016-10-17 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
Hi Tim, The Linux kernel community has a governance close to DPDK. It did allow companies to grow largebusinesses and indivuals to take an active and even influencial roles based on their technical expertise and merits. I don't really understand what can be gained by moving to Linux Foundation,

[dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap

2015-11-30 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
Hi, CAT And CDP technologies look very intriguing Could you elaborate a little on those? -HK From: dev on behalf of O'Driscoll, Tim Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 9:50:58 PM To: dev at dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap As we're nearing th

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-05-08 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
> Sounds like you want something like libc, but DPDK is a system like a user > space OS more then it is a collection of functions that are independent > like strlen, strcpy, memcpy, printf or ... Some parts of DPDK are > independent and can be used as you suggest, but the real performance > sectio

[dpdk-dev] TR: PMD for Cisco VIC Ethernet NIC - Request for guidelines for submission

2014-09-17 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
> From :ssujith at cisco.com<mailto:ssujith at cisco.com> > Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 5:39 AM > To : Hobywan Kenoby; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] PMD for Cisco VIC Ethernet NIC - Request for > guidelines for submission > > Hi Hobywan, > > We?re s

[dpdk-dev] PMD for Cisco VIC Ethernet NIC - Request for guidelines for submission

2014-07-11 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
From: Hobywan Kenoby Date: Thursday, 10 July 2014 1:37 am To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" , "dev at dpdk.org" Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] PMD for Cisco VIC Ethernet NIC - Request for guidelines for submission Hi Sujith, It was exciting to see open source code coming f

[dpdk-dev] PMD for Cisco VIC Ethernet NIC - Request for guidelines for submission

2014-07-09 Thread Hobywan Kenoby
Hi Sujith, It was exciting to see open source code coming from Cisco ensuring a DPDK application can run on any platform and with any cardI haven't seen your patch yet. What happened? HK > Date : Wed, 28 May 2014 08:06> From : dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] > To : dev at dpdk.org