Hi Pavan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 17:23
> To: Herbert Guan ;
> jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com;
> bruce.richard...@intel.com; harry.van.haa...@intel.com
port
4) Add known implementers' IDs (use generic flags/archs by default)
5) Sync build options with config/common_armv8a_linuxapp
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
config/arm/arm64_armv8_linuxapp_gcc | 14 ++
config/arm/meson.build | 99 -
2
port
4) Add known implementers' IDs (use generic flags/archs by default)
5) Sync build options with config/common_armv8a_linuxapp
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
config/arm/arm64_armv8_linuxapp_gcc | 14 ++
config/arm/meson.build | 99 -
2
aa...@intel.com; Herbert Guan ;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pavan Nikhilesh
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] build: add support for detecting march
> on ARM
>
> Added support for detecting march and mcpu by reading midr_el1 register.
> The implementer, primary pa
#x27;m sorry for the disturbance.
Best regards,
Herbert
-邮件原件-
发件人: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
发送时间: 2018年1月19日 7:54
收件人: Herbert Guan
抄送: dev@dpdk.org; jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com; nd
主题: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] arch/arm: optimization for memcpy on AArch64
Ping
s and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob
---
config/common_armv8a_linuxapp | 12 +
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_6
s and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob
---
config/common_armv8a_linuxapp | 12 +
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_6
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 1:04
> To: Herbert Guan
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] arch/arm: optimization for memcpy on
To: Herbert Guan
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arch/arm: optimization for memcpy on AArch64
>
> -Original Message-
> > Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:33:47 +0800
> > From: Herbert Guan
> > To: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
> >
forms and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob
---
config/common_armv8a_linuxapp | 6 +
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_mem
forms and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
config/common_armv8a_linuxapp | 6 +
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
Jerin,
Thanks for review and comments. Please find my feedbacks below inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 15:44
> To: Herbert Guan
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arch
forms and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
config/common_armv8a_linuxapp | 6 +
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
Hi Jerin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 12:06
> To: Herbert Guan
> Cc: Jianbo Liu ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm: optimization for memcpy on AArch64
>
&g
forms and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
config/common_armv8a_linuxapp | 6 +
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2017 22:21
> To: Herbert Guan ; Jianbo Liu
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] arch/arm: optimization for memcpy
Pavan,
Thanks for review and comments. Please find my comments inline below.
Best regards,
Herbert
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 15:33
> To: Herbert Guan ; Jianbo L
Jerin,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments. Please find my comments below
inline.
Best regards,
Herbert
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 20:32
> To: Herbert Guan
> Cc: Jianbo Liu
forms and with the same code, GCC 7.2.0
compiled binary can provide better performance than GCC 4.8.5. It's
suggested to use GCC 5.4.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
.../common/include/arch/arm/rte_memcpy_64.h| 193 +
1 file changed, 193 insert
re
provided to allow comparation between platforms.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c | 50 +---
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c b/test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c
index 91de856..
Fixes: 4c42498d916d ("net/bonding: allow slaves to also be bonded devices")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c
b/drivers/n
s not. For this reason, I think " typedef uint8_t
poly128_t __attribute__((vector_size(16), aligned(16)));" is better.
Could you comment if having different thoughts or concerns?
Thanks,
Herbert
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
asonable.
Best regards,
Herbert
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 22:44
To: Herbert Guan
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jianbo@linaro.org; jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com;
nelio.laranje...@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/ar
nesday, July 19, 2017 0:14
To: Herbert Guan ; dev@dpdk.org;
declan.dohe...@intel.com; jianbo@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test: Fix memory corruption issues which
fails the link_bonding test.
On 7/10/2017 12:13 PM, Herbert Guan wrote:
> Patch V2: fix build warnings by deletin
When test case "test_balance_l23_tx_burst_ipv4_toggle_ip_addr" is
calling balance_l23_tx_burst(), the ip_addr instead of mac_addr
should be toggled according to the test name.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
test/test/test_link_bonding.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
Thank, Jerin. I've fixed the git-log warnings and raised a v2 patch just now.
Best Regards,
Herbert
-Original Message-
From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 1:45
To: Herbert Guan
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jianbo@linaro.org
Subjec
Use built-in data types for unsupported poly64/128 types
for GCC version lower than 4.9.0
Fixes: 3c4b4024c225 ("arch/arm: add vcopyq_laneq_u32 for old gcc")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_vect.h | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertion
Fixes: 3c4b4024c2 (arch/arm: add vcopyq_laneq_u32 for old gcc)
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_vect.h | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_vect.h
b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm
exits.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
test/test/test_link_bonding.c | 64 ++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/test/test_link_bonding.c b/test/test/test_link_bonding.c
index aa2a1a2..140d864 100644
--- a/test
ports' tx queue in the clean up function
remove_slaves_and_stop_bonded_device() of each test cases.
2) Do not release allocated mbufs for test bursts. These mbufs
will be released in remove_slaves_and_stop_bonded_device() when
test case exits.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan
---
test
30 matches
Mail list logo
