Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] eal: fix unlock in rte_eal_memzone_init

2018-12-20 Thread Gao Feng
At 2018-12-20 19:36:14, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >20/12/2018 12:20, Thomas Monjalon: >> 07/12/2018 09:57, Burakov, Anatoly: >> > On 07-Dec-18 1:20 AM, Gao Feng wrote: >> > > The RTE_PROC_PRIMARY error handler lost the unlock statement in the >> &

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix unlock in rte_eal_memzone_init

2018-12-20 Thread Gao Feng
At 2018-12-20 19:20:53, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >07/12/2018 09:57, Burakov, Anatoly: >> On 07-Dec-18 1:20 AM, Gao Feng wrote: >> > The RTE_PROC_PRIMARY error handler lost the unlock statement in the >> > current codes. Now unlock and return in one place to f

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix unlock in rte_eal_memzone_init

2018-12-06 Thread Gao Feng
The RTE_PROC_PRIMARY error handler lost the unlock statement in the current codes. Now unlock and return in one place to fix it. Fixes: 49df3db84883 ("memzone: replace memzone array with fbarray") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Gao Feng --- v2: Unlock and return in one place, p

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix unlock in rte_eal_memzone_init

2018-12-06 Thread Gao Feng
At 2018-12-06 17:09:23, "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: >On 06-Dec-18 12:47 AM, gfree.w...@vip.163.com wrote: >> From: Gao Feng >> >> The RTE_PROC_PRIMARY error handler lost the unlock statement in the >> current codes. Now fix it. >> >> Signed-o

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] devtools: fix symbol check when adding experimental section

2018-12-04 Thread Gao Feng
Sorry for the noise. Please ignore this reply. It is caused by wrong command. Best Regards Feng At 2018-12-05 10:50:26, "" wrote: >From: David Marchand > >The incriminated commit did relax the condition to catch all sections >but dropped the + removal which can trigger false detection of the >