[dpdk-dev] Vlan not working with Mellanox NIC on VmWare

2021-10-01 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, We were trying to test the vlan filter with Melloanox nic(SR-IOV) on VmWare using the mlx5_pmd. But found that after doing the mlx5_vlan_filter_set with the vlan id also, we are not receiving the tagged packets upto the application. The same works fine in we are using KV

Re: [dpdk-dev] Not able to start IAVF PMD with dpdk 20.11.3

2021-09-24 Thread Dey, Souvik
ds, Souvik -Original Message- From: dev On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 1:57 AM To: Wu, Jingjing ; dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-dev] Not able to start IAVF PMD with dpdk 20.11.3 With vfio_pci , I am getting the following error and b

Re: [dpdk-dev] Not able to start IAVF PMD with dpdk 20.11.3

2021-09-23 Thread Dey, Souvik
: [ 323.376403] vfio-pci: probe of :08:00.0 failed with error -22 Sep 24 01:50:29 connexip kernel: [ 323.376440] vfio-pci: probe of :08:00.0 failed with error -22 I am using kernel 4.19.194 from debian buster. From: Wu, Jingjing Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 8:41 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; dev

[dpdk-dev] Not able to start IAVF PMD with dpdk 20.11.3

2021-09-23 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, Trying to test E810 Sr-IOV based nic card with 20.11.3 dpdk. I am running the host kernel driver and only the VF is attached to the VM where I am running dpdk. But when I attaching the VF to the testpmd it is throwing the below error. Is there are way to move forward here ? [root@c

[dpdk-dev] Link status is not coming properly in case of 82599 on VmWare SR-IOV case.

2021-04-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, We are seeing a weird issue where the link status of 82599 NIC in SR-IOV mode in VmWare is coming as UP even though the vmnic is taken DOWN in the ESXi. This is working fine when we use a linux to handle the interface inside of DPDK. We are using DPDK 18.11.6 and seeing this issue s

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 19.11 v2] net/mlx5: fix storing the synched MAC to internal table

2021-02-17 Thread Dey, Souvik
From: Souvik Dey [ upstream commit 493f0bb51c1144eedcff2bba199cab1b64ff9fd0 ] As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 19.11] net/mlx5: fix storing the synched MAC to internal table

2021-02-12 Thread Dey, Souvik
From: Souvik Dey [ upstream commit 493f0bb51c1144eedcff2bba199cab1b64ff9fd0 ] As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] common/mlx5: fix storing the synched MAC to internal table

2021-02-03 Thread Dey, Souvik
he patch itself as you have already acked ? -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: dev On Behalf Of Slava Ovsiienko Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 3:04 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; Raslan Darawsheh ; Matan Azrad Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] c

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] common/mlx5: fix storing the synched MAC to internal table

2021-02-02 Thread Dey, Souvik
From: Souvik Dey As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the synched MAC of 33:33:00:00:00:01 gets stored in the unicast section

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] common/mlx5: fix storing the synched MAC to internal table

2021-02-01 Thread Dey, Souvik
From: Souvik Dey As the internal MAC table is divided into Unicast and Multicast address sections, we should check the type of synched MAC address before storing it to the internal table. Currently the check is not done, and the synched MAC of 33:33:00:00:00:01 gets stored in the unicast section

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Guo, Raised the v3 of the patch , but was not sure how to put the ACK. If you don’t mind can you please ACK the same. Thanks. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/85210/ -- Regards, Souvik From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 8:16 AM To: Guo, Jia ; Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z Cc

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-15 Thread Souvik Dey
it will be ignored. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- v3: * Changed the error log in case vlan strip command fails as per the latest comment. --- v2: * Simplied the commit log. * goto err; is not required as it has only one more return path and there is no cleanup required apart from just return err

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Guo, Ok sure will remove the extra log and submit the version 3. I have not received any other comments , so will also add your ACK in the next version then. -- Regards, Souvik From: Guo, Jia Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 9:24 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z Cc: dev

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-12 Thread Souvik Dey
it will be ignored. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- v2: * Simplied the commit log. * goto err; is not required as it has only one more return path and there is no cleanup required apart from just return err. * Updated the comment start from /* -> /** * Changed the error log in case vlan st

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-12 Thread Souvik Dey
it will be ignored. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- v2: * Simplied the commit log. * goto err; is not required as it has only one more return path and there is no cleanup required apart from just return err. * Updated the comment start from /* -> /** * Changed the error log in case vlan st

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-12 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Guo, Thanks for the comments. I will upload a v2 of the patch. -- Regards, Souvik From: Guo, Jia Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 10:08 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
-off-by: Souvik Dey --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c index c26b036..2ecf74b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c +++ b/drivers/net

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
-off-by: Souvik Dey --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c index c26b036..2ecf74b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c +++ b/drivers/net

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
-off-by: Souvik Dey --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c index c26b036..2ecf74b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c +++ b/drivers/net

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5:fix storing the synced MAC to internal table

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
: Souvik Dey --- drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c b/drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c index 40d8620..ef7a521 100644 --- a/drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c +++ b/drivers

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5:fix storing the synced MAC to internal table

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
the multicast MACs are added properly to both the internal table and also the device, specially in case of SR-IOV VF. Souvik Dey (1): net/mlx5:fix storing the synced MAC to internal table drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5:fix storing the synced MAC to internal table

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
: Souvik Dey --- drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c b/drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c index 40d8620..da56add 100644 --- a/drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c +++ b/drivers

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5:fix storing the synced MAC to internal table

2020-12-09 Thread Souvik Dey
the multicast MACs are added properly to both the internal table and also the device, specially in case of SR-IOV VF. Souvik Dey (1): net/mlx5:fix storing the synced MAC to internal table drivers/common/mlx5/linux/mlx5_nl.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions

[dpdk-dev] DPDK AF_XDP test results.

2020-11-10 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, There is a test plan for the performance tests of different scenarios with AF_XDP in the dpdk docs https://doc.dpdk.org/dts/test_plans/af_xdp_test_plan.html , but I am not able to find the test results of the same. Can anyone please help in sharing the results link for t

[dpdk-dev] net/bnx2x: Qlogic nic card support (1077:16a1)

2020-10-05 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I see that the linux bnx2x driver supports the following vendor id : device id * vendor: 1077 ("QLogic Corp."), device: 16a1 * vendor: 1077 ("QLogic Corp."), device: 16a4 * vendor: 1077 ("QLogic Corp."), device: 16ad but this are not supported by the bnx2x_pmd. This co

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-18 Thread Dey, Souvik
t test the tx path with big packets. Also Arp packets are failing to reach through the kni interface. Again, thanks a ton for the 18.11.9 Tx path issue resolution. -- Regards, Souvik From: Long Li Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 3:09 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; Kevin Traynor ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-17 Thread Dey, Souvik
, 2020 2:58 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; Kevin Traynor ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Yigit, Ferruh ; Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9 NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
change as my same app does not work any longer. -- Regards, Souvik From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:32 PM To: Long Li ; Kevin Traynor ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Yigit, Ferruh ; Stephen Hemminger Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9 If it

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
If it helps the tx_conf->tx_free_thresh is set to 0 from app side and nb_desc is set to 4096 from the app. The same was set in 18.11.6 too. From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:44 PM To: 'Long Li' ; Kevin Traynor ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Yigit, Ferr

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
Thanks in advance for all the help. -- Regards, Souvik From: Long Li Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 1:44 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; Kevin Traynor ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Yigit, Ferruh ; Stephen Hemminger Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
packets. -- Regards, Souvik From: dev On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 10:18 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; lon...@microsoft.com; Yigit, Ferruh ; sthem...@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

[dpdk-dev] Issue with net/netvsc pmd in 18.11.9

2020-09-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I updated from dpdk 18.11.6 to 18.11.9 and my netvsc pmd stopped working as expected. Firstly, I saw a crash in tx packets as soon as the dpdk app comes up. In doing some googling found a bug that was fixed after 18.11.9 https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75001/ . Ported this fix and w

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-09-14 Thread Dey, Souvik
cause this. Thanks for your help. -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 5:59 PM To: beilei.x...@intel.com; qi.z.zh...@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dey, Souvik Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest From: "Dey, S

Re: [dpdk-dev] i40eVF pmd vlan id handling

2020-06-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
you check by setting the above offload and if that helps you . -- Thanks, Souvik From: Yan Fridland Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 8:34 AM To: Dey, Souvik Subject: RE: i40eVF pmd vlan id handling NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender

Re: [dpdk-dev] i40eVF pmd vlan id handling

2020-04-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
uesday, April 14, 2020 2:37 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org Cc: Yigit, Ferruh ; Zhang, Qi Z Subject: RE: i40eVF pmd vlan id handling NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender Hi Souvik, With kerne

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-04-14 Thread Souvik Dey
disable the vlan strip after sending add_vlan if app configured the VLAN_STRIP as disabled. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 16 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-04-14 Thread Souvik Dey
disable the vlan strip after sending add_vlan if app configured the VLAN_STRIP as disabled. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 16 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: issue with ADD VLAN from Guest

2020-04-14 Thread Souvik Dey
From: "Dey, Souvik" In case of i40evf pmd, when ADD_VLAN is sent down the linux i40e driver, along with add the vlan the kernel driver also enables the vlan stripping by default. This might have issues if the app configured DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP as off at the port configuratio

Re: [dpdk-dev] i40eVF pmd vlan id handling

2020-04-13 Thread Dey, Souvik
p(dev); + } return err; } Or we need to call . vlan_offload_set after doing . vlan_filter_set from the DPDK app ? -- Regards, Souvik From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 12:04 PM To: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org; beilei.x...@intel.com Cc: ferruh.yi...@intel.com; qi.z.zh...@intel

[dpdk-dev] i40eVF pmd vlan id handling

2020-04-13 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I am using DPDK 18.11.2 and i40e PF linux driver on the host 2.4.6. I see there, when I enable DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER from the DPDK app, and then configure the specific vlan id using rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter(). As per DPDK code by default when we do dev_configure, we call i40e

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case

2020-04-06 Thread Dey, Souvik
: Dey, Souvik Cc: Rasesh Mody ; Shahed Shaikh ; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; tho...@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case NOTICE: This email was received

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/bnx2x: handle guest VLAN for SR-IOV case

2020-04-06 Thread Dey, Souvik
From: Souvik Dey In case of bnx2xvf pmd, tx packets can support vland id in 2 ways: 1. setting the mbuf ol_flags=PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT and passing the vlanid in mbuf->vlan_tci. 2. the tx packet itself has the vlan id included in the packet. The first case is working as expected but the second c

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] net/bnx2x: add multicast MAC address filtering

2020-04-06 Thread Dey, Souvik
Jacob Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2020 9:10 AM To: Rasesh Mody Cc: Dey, Souvik ; Shahed Shaikh ; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; tho...@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] net/bnx2x: add multicast MAC address filtering

[dpdk-dev] support of kni ethtool for other drivers

2020-03-10 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, Is there any plan to support ethtool for other drivers apart from igb/ixgbe for kni interfaes ? -- Regards, Souvik

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case

2020-03-05 Thread Dey, Souvik
Thanks will do that. And will also try to remove the trailer in the patches. Thanks for pointing it out. From: dev On Behalf Of Rasesh Mody Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 6:01 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; Shahed Shaikh ; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran ; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; tho...@monjalon.net Cc: dev

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with X550 link status

2020-03-04 Thread Dey, Souvik
18.11.6 which breaks the ixgbevf link status. When is plan for 18.11.7 or updated 18.11.6 as we should not have a broken release. -- Regads, Souvik From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 4:08 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: xiaolong...@intel.com; xiao.zh...@intel.com; us...@dpdk.org; Stephen

Re: [dpdk-dev] Issue with X550 link status

2020-03-04 Thread Dey, Souvik
]: Intel Corporation X550 Virtual Function [8086:1565] So the mac_type is ixgbe_mac_X550_vf in the below case. -- Regards, Souvik From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 1:17 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: xiaolong...@intel.com; xiao.zh...@intel.com; us...@dpdk.org Subject: Issue with X550

[dpdk-dev] Issue with X550 link status

2020-03-04 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, After upgrading to DPDK 18.11.6 LTS release from 18.11.2 the link_update call for link status update is not working for X550 NICs SR-IOV enabled. On debugging it looks like the change introduced as a part of this patch is causing the issue. https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case

2020-03-02 Thread Dey, Souvik
is included in thetx packets itself was found not working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it to just the ethertype in case of VF. Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik" --- v2: * Fix compilation issues.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bnx2x: add multicast MAC address filtering

2020-02-28 Thread Dey, Souvik
Add support the set_mc_addr_list device operation in the bnx2xvf PMD. The configured addresses are stored in the device private area, so they can be flushed before adding new ones. Without this v6 multicast packets were properly forwarded to the Guest VF. Signed-off-by: "Dey, S

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case

2020-02-28 Thread Dey, Souvik
is included in thetx packets itself was found not working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it to just the ethertype in case of VF. Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik" --- v2: * Fix compilation issues.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case

2020-02-28 Thread Dey, Souvik
is included in thetx packets itself was found not working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it to just the ethertype in case of VF. Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik" --- v2: * Fixed complitaion issues e

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bnx2x: handle guest vlan for SR-IOV case

2020-02-26 Thread Dey, Souvik
is included in thetx packets itself was found not working as expected. To handle that we need to properly set the start_bd bitfield and the vlan_or_ethertype instead of setting it to just the ethertype in case of VF. Signed-off-by: "Dey, Souvik" --- drivers/net/bnx2x

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] kni: fix possible kernel crash with va2pa

2019-06-17 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Yigit, I was facing the kernel crash issue, at skb_over_put(), using dpdk using 18.11 on 4.19.28 kernel. On checking I did find this patch and this patch is solving the issue also. But then I saw you comment in the patch and that’s looks scary to have the patch. Is there any im

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix possible kernel crash with va2pa

2019-06-14 Thread Dey, Souvik
Was there any update to this patch , I am also seeing kernel crash in kni_net_rx_normal dueing skb_put which is happening for chained mbufs. -- Regards, Souvik From: dev On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 12:31 PM To: Yangchao Zhou ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [

[dpdk-dev] kernel crash with DPDK 18.11

2019-06-14 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I am using DPDK 18.11 with linux kernel 4.19.28. I have kni devices created and I can see a crash in the kernel with ipv6/v4 fragmented packets. Does anyone seen this already or is there any fixes/patches available for this . Snippet of kernel panic Message from syslogd@

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets

2018-10-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
have rte_eth_allmulticast_enable() enabled but without any success. -- Regards, Souvik From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:06 AM To: Ruinan Hu ; Ruinan Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets Hi Ruinan

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets

2018-10-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
think vanilla linux driver (i40evf) is using promiscuous mode to receive multicast packets. -- Regards, Souvik From: Ruinan Hu Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 3:36 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; Ruinan Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets

2018-10-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
Moreover I wanted to mention one more thing, that the issue of multicast packets not working is only with DPDK 140eVF PMD. In case I use the i40evf of the kernel then it is working fine and I don’t see any issues with v6. So why is the trust mode a requirement for DPDK pmd ? From: Dey, Souvik

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets

2018-10-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 2:33 PM To: Dey, Souvik Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender Hi, Did you enable

[dpdk-dev] i40e VF PMD not getting multicast packets

2018-10-15 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I am currently facing issues with getting the multicast IPv6 packets when using the i40evf pmd. I do see there is a limitation mentioned in the release notes of DPDK that 16.27. I40e VF may not receive packets in the promiscuous mode Description: Promiscuous mode is not s

Re: [dpdk-dev] I40evf VLAN stripping disable

2018-06-11 Thread Dey, Souvik
/broadcast promisc mode is disabled by default. -- Regard, Souvik From: Xing, Beilei [mailto:beilei.x...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:58 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; Wu, Jingjing ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: us...@dpdk.org Subject: RE: I40evf VLAN stripping disable NOTICE

[dpdk-dev] I40evf VLAN stripping disable

2018-06-08 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi i40e/i40evf maintainers, I was testing VLANs with i40evf pmd and is hitting the below issue. I have the following configuration: - host runs with Linux pf i40e driver(version 2.4.6) - guest runs with DPDK 17.11.2 vf i40e driver When I am sending a vlan packet from the outside to the guest, on

[dpdk-dev] Reset of VF link in IXGBE

2018-01-29 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I see few patches in the DPDK regarding "Implement device reset on VF" and also "support reset of VF link" but I am not sure which version of DPDK is having the changes. Are they at all upstreamed or they are still under discussion. I am currently using DPDK 16.11, and faci

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] drivers/net/ena: Copy PCI info to rte_eth_dev

2018-01-17 Thread Dey, Souvik
Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 2:17 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; j...@semihalf.com; j...@semihalf.com; neta...@amazon.com; evge...@amazon.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] drivers/net/ena: Copy PCI info to

[dpdk-dev] Getting PF link status to DPDK-VF in case of SR-IOV

2017-06-27 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Ferruh/Lu, I see that both of you have posted multiple patches in DPDK wrt IXGBE SR-IOV and PF to VF link status/ I am trying to use DPDK 16.11 and do see that it has the support of both pinging VF when PF link status changes and also VF support of mailbox msg when PF link is

[dpdk-dev] Hyper-V PMD in DPDK

2017-06-26 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, Do we have the Hyper-V DPDK PMD available now in 17.05 release. I don't see the drivers present. Can someone update me on the status of the same and if it already there in any active DPDK release ? -- Regards, Souvik

Re: [dpdk-dev] Query on VM_BUS and HyperV PMD

2017-04-04 Thread Dey, Souvik
Ok thanks. -Original Message- From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 12:10 AM To: Dey, Souvik Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Query on VM_BUS and HyperV PMD On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:23:36AM +, Dey, Souvik wrote: > Hi

[dpdk-dev] Query on VM_BUS and HyperV PMD

2017-04-04 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, As DPDK 16.11 is an LTS release is there any plans to backport the VM-BUS and HyperV PMD from 17.05 to 16.11. -- Regards, Souvik

[dpdk-dev] Getting crash in rte_pktmbuf_alloc with 16.11 DPDK

2017-03-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi , I am trying to do rte_pktmbuf_alloc from a mempool within a secondary process after doing a rte_mempool_lookup for the same mempool. But the rte_pktmbuf_alloc crashes with the below backtrace #0 0x in ?? () #1 0x00423da2 in rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bul

[dpdk-dev] Getting crash in rte_pktmbuf_alloc with 16.11 DPDK

2017-03-16 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi , I am trying to do rte_pktmbuf_alloc from a mempool within a secondary process after doing a rte_mempool_lookup for the same mempool. But the rte_pktmbuf_alloc crashes with the below backtrace #0 0x in ?? () #1 0x00423da2 in rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bul

Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF

2016-12-08 Thread Dey, Souvik
required to be done (both in DPDK or on PF) to get this working all the configured MC_ADDRs ? I am using 2.1 DPDK on the guest and kernel 4.4 ixgbe PF drivers on the host . -- Regards, Souvik From: Lu, Wenzhuo [mailto:wenzhuo...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 6:35 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; dev

Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF

2016-12-05 Thread Dey, Souvik
: Sunday, December 4, 2016 9:02 PM To: Dey, Souvik ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF Hi Souvik, To my opinion, rte_eth_dev_set_mc_addr_list has nothing to do with rte_eth_allmulticast_enable. rte_eth_allmulticast_enable is enough for the multicast

Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF

2016-12-02 Thread Dey, Souvik
Adding wenzhuo...@intel.com<mailto:wenzhuo...@intel.com> From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 12:27 PM To: 'dev@dpdk.org' Subject: ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF Hi All, I am trying to support multicast packet over SRIOV using kern

[dpdk-dev] ixgbevf: support multicast packets from PF to VF

2016-12-02 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I am trying to support multicast packet over SRIOV using kernel PF + DPDK VF(ixgbevf) drivers for ipv6. I am currently using 2.1 DPDK and found that there was a patch in 16.04 for "ixgbe: support multicast promiscuous mode on VF". So I have backported the patch to the 2.1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-10-07 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 6:30 PM To: Kavanagh, Mark B Cc: Dey, Souvik ; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio I think current patch is fine. If someone has later problem with it on

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-10-06 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Stephen/Liu, Any other comments or suggestions for this. If the below patch looks fine then please do suggest the next steps . -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:05 AM To

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-10-05 Thread Dey, Souvik
w if this looks good or we have few more comments. -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 4:16 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; stephen at networkplumber.org Cc: dev at dpdk.org

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-10-04 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, Is there any further comments or modifications required for this patch, or what next steps do you guys suggest here ? -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2016 10:09 AM To: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-10-01 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Liu/Stephen/Mark, I have submitted Version 7 of this patch. Do let me know if this looks proper. -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Dey, Souvik Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 4:32 PM To: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; stephen at

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-29 Thread Dey
erage this 'set_mtu' functionality to resolve the above mentioned issue of packets getting dropped due to incorrect size. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- Changes in v7: - Replaced the CRC_LEN with the merge rx buf header length. - Changed the frame_len max validation to VIRTIO_MAX_RX_P

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-28 Thread Dey, Souvik
OK sure will do that. -Original Message- From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:12 PM To: Dey, Souvik Cc: Stephen Hemminger ; Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio On Tue, Sep

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-27 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Stephen, So what should be my next steps , should I submit a v7 for this patch or you suggest otherwise. -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 2:57 PM To: Dey, Souvik Cc: Kavanagh

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-27 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, Any further updates/comments on this ? -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com] Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 11:21 PM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Dey, Souvik ; Kavanagh, Mark B ; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-23 Thread Dey, Souvik
.com] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:08 AM To: Yuanhan Liu ; Stephen Hemminger Cc: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio >Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio > >On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:45:05PM -0700, Steph

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-22 Thread Dey
erage this 'set_mtu' functionality to resolve the above mentioned issue of packets getting dropped due to incorrect size. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- Changes in v6: - Description of change corrected - Corrected the identations - Corrected the subject line too - The From line was a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-22 Thread Dey, Souvik
as that will be valid for both vlan offload on and off cases. -Original Message- From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:45 PM To: Dey, Souvik Cc: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org Sub

[dpdk-dev] Issue with patchwork

2016-09-22 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, I am sending git send-mail and the patch mail is also getting sent but I am not able see the patch in the patchwork link. Can someone point what might have gone wrong. It was working fine earlier though. Thanks in advance for any kind of help. -- Regards, Souvik

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-22 Thread Dey, Souvik
Answers inline. -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:22 PM To: Dey, Souvik Cc: mark.b.kavanagh at intel.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-21 Thread Dey
roller can then leverage this 'set_mtu' functionality to resolve the above mentioned issue of packets getting dropped due to incorrect size. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- Changes in v6: - Description of change corrected - Corrected the identations - Corrected the subject line too - Th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-21 Thread Dey
roller can then leverage this 'set_mtu' functionality to resolve the above mentioned issue of packets getting dropped due to incorrect size. Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey --- Changes in v6: - Description of change corrected - Corrected the identations - Corrected the subject line too - Th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-21 Thread Dey
From: Souvik Dey Virtio interfaces do not currently allow the user to specify a particular Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU).Consequently, the MTU of Virtio interfaces is typically set to the Ethernet default value of 1500. This is problematic in the case of cloud deployments, in which a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/virtio: add set_mtu in virtio

2016-09-21 Thread Dey
From: Souvik Dey Virtio interfaces do not currently allow the user to specify a particular Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU).Consequently, the MTU of Virtio interfaces is typically set to the Ethernet default value of 1500. This is problematic in the case of cloud deployments, in which a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey

2016-09-21 Thread Dey
From: Souvik Dey Virtio interfaces do not currently allow the user to specify a particular Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU).Consequently, the MTU of Virtio interfaces is typically set to the Ethernet default value of 1500. This is problematic in the case of cloud deployments, in which a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio

2016-09-20 Thread Dey, Souvik
I have already taken care of this in v5 of the patch , If possible please review the same . -Original Message- From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:12 AM To: Kavanagh, Mark B Cc: Dey, Souvik ; dev at dpdk.org; stephen at

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio

2016-09-14 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Mark/Liu, I know this might be a redundant question, but should I put your names in the Reviewed-by section in v5 ? -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 8:16 AM To: Dey, Souvik

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio

2016-09-14 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi Mark/Liu, Is there any further comments to the below patch ? Should I submit it as v5 of the patch ? -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:12 AM To: Kavanagh, Mark B

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio

2016-09-12 Thread Dey, Souvik
-Original Message- From: Kavanagh, Mark B [mailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:48 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio > >Hi Ma

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio

2016-09-12 Thread Dey, Souvik
Hi All, Any further comments or updates to be made in the below patch else I will go ahead a submit the v5 for the same. -- Regards, Souvik -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dey, Souvik Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 2:16 PM To: Kavanagh

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio

2016-09-09 Thread Dey, Souvik
ailto:mark.b.kavan...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:44 AM To: Dey, Souvik ; Yuanhan Liu Cc: dev at dpdk.org; stephen at networkplumber.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v4]net/virtio: add mtu set in virtio > >Hi Mark, > >Yes I thought I did that change. Sorry once again.. making too

  1   2   >