Matthew Hall wrote:
> Alex,
>
> You rock, thanks for supplying this, I'll be sure to use it along with
> upstream changes from BSD to get a friendlier license for users of my code,
> whoever they might eventually be.
>
> If I forked this from you and updated it to the latest code periodically f
Matthew Hall wrote:
> The pflua guys made a user-space copy of Linux BPF JIT. I'm planning to use
> that because it was almost as fast as pflua with a lot fewer usage headaches
> and dependencies.
Ah, I see.
> I'm making an MIT licensed app... so it isn't an issue for me personally if
> there
Jim Thompson wrote:
> BPF JIT, or even pflua[1] should be straight-forward to put on top of DPDK.
> (It?s straight-forward to do on top of netmap.)
>
> jim
>
> [1] https://github.com/Igalia/pflua-bench
Glad to see LuaJIT here. I hope to DPDK will eventually add support for
LuaJIT.
Alex
Matthew Hall wrote:
> However despite this issue, there are some cases where the Linux stack is
> greatly superior to the BSD one although normally the opposite is the case...
> AF_NETLINK for configuring 10,000+ IP addresses, especially for L4-L7
> performance testing, would be one possible exa
4 matches
Mail list logo
