[dpdk-dev] Unsupported SFP+ Module - Hardware Initialization Failure -19

2016-08-30 Thread Alex Forster
I suspect I may have. Anybody able to offer any advice? Alex Forster [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-October/024973.html

[dpdk-dev] Flow Director Example?

2016-05-02 Thread Alex Forster
the same RX queues. I haven't been able to find any examples of using Flow Director with DPDK, so I'm sure I'm doing something obviously wrong here, but I can't figure out what it is. Alex Forster On 5/2/16, 1:38 AM, "Zhang, Helin" wrote: >Hi Alex > >Can

[dpdk-dev] Flow Director Example?

2016-04-29 Thread Alex Forster
Would anyone be able to point me in the right direction here? Thanks in advance! Alex Forster

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-19 Thread Alex Forster
* ixgbe_init_phy_ops_82599() is defined >> * IXGBE_ERR_SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED is returned after calling >> phy->ops.identify() >> >> ixgbe_82599.c at 2085 >> * ixgbe_identify_phy_82599() is defined >> * calls ixgbe_identify_module_generic() >> >> ixgbe_phy.c at 12

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-15 Thread Alex Forster
eter as it >will always be enabled by default. > >- Alex It's hard to see in the patch, but I basically replaced that whole option check block with: { /* * allow_unsupported_sfp - Enable/Disable support for unsupported * and untested SFP+ modules. */ adapter->hw.allow_unsupported_sfp = true; } Alex Forster

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-15 Thread Alex Forster
On 10/15/15, 12:17 PM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote: >On 10/15/2015 08:43 AM, Alex Forster wrote: >> On 10/15/15, 11:30 AM, "Alexander Duyck" >>wrote: >> >>> On 10/15/2015 07:46 AM, Alex Forster wrote: >>>> On 10/13/15, 4:34 PM, "Al

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-15 Thread Alex Forster
On 10/15/15, 11:30 AM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote: >On 10/15/2015 07:46 AM, Alex Forster wrote: >> On 10/13/15, 4:34 PM, "Alexander Duyck" >>wrote: >> >>> If you are using Intel's out-of-tree ixgbe driver I believe the module >>> pa

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-15 Thread Alex Forster
On 10/15/15, 11:30 AM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote: >On 10/15/2015 07:46 AM, Alex Forster wrote: >> On 10/13/15, 4:34 PM, "Alexander Duyck" >>wrote: >> >>> If you are using Intel's out-of-tree ixgbe driver I believe the module >>> pa

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-15 Thread Alex Forster
unsupported SFP message when running the tests. Before I start arbitrarily trying to patch out parts of the SFP verification code in ixgbe, are there any other tips I should know? Alex Forster

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-13 Thread Alex Forster
his a bug, or is there a way to work around this that I'm not aware of? Alex Forster

[dpdk-dev] Question about unsupported transceivers

2015-10-13 Thread Alex Forster
n floating around about this issue may be out of date. Alex Forster