RE: Issue with DPDK-Burst Replay – No Frame Transmission Observed Despite Successful Replay

Hi, On Fri, 25 Jul 2025, Gokul K R (MS/ETA7-ETAS) wrote: Hi Ivan, Yes, I rechecked. The PCAP file has the correct source and destination MAC addresses, and promiscuous mode is enabled on receiver NIC. Question 1: Is there a recommended way to verify whether packets are actually being transmi

[PATCH v2] net/tap: fix BPF build failure in cross-compilation environment

During cross-compilation, BPF build incorrectly includes header files from the host system instead of the target sysroot. This leads to build failures due to incompatible headers or unavailability of header files in the host. Fix by using the Meson sysroot property to correctly locate and include

Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] doc: announce DMA configuration structure changes

>> Deprecate rte_dma_conf structure to allow for a more flexible >> configuration of DMA devices. >> The new structure will have a flags field instead of multiple >> boolean fields for each feature. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh >> --- >> +* dmadev: The ``rt

[PATCH v2] net/tap: fix BPF build failure in cross-compilation environment

During cross-compilation, BPF build incorrectly includes header files from the host system instead of the target sysroot. This leads to build failures due to incompatible headers or unavailability of header files in the host. Fix by using the Meson sysroot property to correctly locate and include

Re: [RFC] Proposal for stable developer-friendly DTS API

I second Patrick's comments

RE: Issue with DPDK-Burst Replay – No Frame Transmission Observed Despite Successful Replay

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, Gokul K R (MS/ETA7-ETAS) wrote: Hi, In the meantime, I was able to successfully replay my PCAP file using the dpdk-burst-replay tool from your repository (https://github.com/FraudBuster/dpdk-burst-replay). Below is the output from the tool: sudo ./src/dpdk-replay wendut

24.11.3 patches review and test

Hi all, Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 24.11.3. The planned date for the final release is 12th August 2025. Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and reported val

RE: [PATCH v4] eal: fix uncheck lcore ID and lcore role

> From: Dengdui Huang [mailto:huangdeng...@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2025 13.26 > > The worker_id may come from user input. So it is necessary to verify it. > > In addition, only the lcore whose role is ROLE_RTE or ROLE_SERVICE can > be > launched. This patch adds the lcore role check

RE: Issue with DPDK-Burst Replay – No Frame Transmission Observed Despite Successful Replay

Hi Ivan, I hope you're doing well. Point #1: Since the DPDK-Burst Replay tool is not an official part of the DPDK project and is community-developed, could you please let us know whom we should contact for support or further information regarding this tool? Point #2: We have identified an issu

RE: [PATCH v5 11/22] test/telemetry: catch errors in subshell

> -Original Message- > From: David Marchand > Sent: Wednesday 23 July 2025 14:32 > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Bruce Richardson > Subject: [PATCH v5 11/22] test/telemetry: catch errors in subshell > > This script relies on subshell and pipes to prepare a list of commands > to pass to the tele

[PATCH v4] eal: fix uncheck lcore ID and lcore role

The worker_id may come from user input. So it is necessary to verify it. In addition, only the lcore whose role is ROLE_RTE or ROLE_SERVICE can be launched. This patch adds the lcore role check. Fixes: a95d70547c57 ("eal: factorize lcore main loop") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Dengdui Hua

RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] trace: force 8 byte alignment when --no-huge is used

> -Original Message- > From: David Christensen > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 5:36 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: David Christensen ; Jerin Jacob ; > Sunil Kumar Kori ; Tyler Retzlaff > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] trace: force 8 byte alignment when --no-huge is > used > > Current code

RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] app/test: remove use of non-standard array range initialization

> > > > > Array range initialization is non-standard and is not provided by > > > all compilers. MSVC does not implement it and ends up emitting > > > errors like the one below: > > > > > > drivers/net/r8169/r8169_phy.c(380): > > > error C2143: syntax error: missing ':' before '...' > > > ca

RE: Issue with DPDK-Burst Replay – No Frame Transmission Observed Despite Successful Replay

Hi, On Thu, 24 Jul 2025, Gokul K R (MS/ETA7-ETAS) wrote: Hi Ivan, I hope you're doing well. Point #1: Since the DPDK-Burst Replay tool is not an official part of the DPDK project and is community-developed, could you please let us know whom we should contact for support or further informati

RE: [PATCH 2/2] net: remove v25 ABI compatibility

> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Richardson > Sent: Wednesday 23 July 2025 13:15 > To: Marchand, David > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: remove v25 ABI compatibility > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 03:24:41PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > Now that t