This adds the Virtual Function device ID to the list of
supported NVIDIA devices that run the MLX5 compress PMD.
Signed-off-by: Michael Baum
Acked-by: Matan Azrad
---
drivers/compress/mlx5/mlx5_compress.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/compress/mlx5/mlx5_compres
Add HWS support of IPv4 fragment packet id field matching.
Signed-off-by: Michael Baum
Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker
Acked-by: Matan Azrad
---
drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.c | 11 ++-
drivers/net/mlx5/hws/mlx5dr_definer.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
dif
On 2024/4/6 0:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:44:09 +0800
> Dengdui Huang wrote:
>
>> When the port's timestamping function failed to initialize
>> (for example, the device does not support PTP), the packets
>> received by the hardware do not contain the timestamp.
>> In
Hello Bruce,
Thank a lot for your constant support in resolving this query.
Best Regards,
Avijit Pandey
Cloud SME | VoerEirAB
+919598570190
From: Bruce Richardson
Date: Tuesday, 2 April 2024 at 14:43
To: Avijit Pandey
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Error in rte_eal_init() when multiple PODs
RedHat QE tested below 18 scenarios on RHEL9.4 and didn't find any new dpdk
issues.
- Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size):
PASS
- Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size)
: PASS
- Guest with device assignment(VF) through
On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:30:38 -0600
Ashish Sadanandan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:52 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 02/04/2024 18:03, Ashish Sadanandan:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > I've made the updates as suggested. Could someone please review the
> > latest
> > > patchset? Not sure if
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 13:07:06 +0200
Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:hof...@lysator.liu.se]
> > Sent: Sunday, 7 April 2024 11.32
> >
> > On 2024-04-04 19:15, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > > This series is not intended for merge. It insteat provides examples
> > of
> > > c
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 11:36:59 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> On 2024-04-06 17:28, Morten Brørup wrote:
> >> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, 4 April 2024 19.15
> >>
> >> RFC sample illustrating simple conversion of VLA to alloca().
> >>
> >> Signed-of
From: Shai Brandes
[ upstream commit c8a1898f82f8c04cbe1d3e2d0eec0705386c23f7 ]
The driver accidentally allocates a huge memory
buffer for the customer metrics because it uses
an uninitialized variable for the buffer length.
This can lead to excessive memory footprint for
the driver which can ev
From: Shai Brandes
Hi, the fix is for a bug that was introduced in 23.11.
The fix was already merged into 24.03 indirectly as part of c8a1898f82f8
("net/ena: improve style and readability")
and the entire function was later restructured in patch bcb1753156ac
("net/ena/base: modify customer met
> From: Mattias Rönnblom [mailto:hof...@lysator.liu.se]
> Sent: Sunday, 7 April 2024 11.32
>
> On 2024-04-04 19:15, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > This series is not intended for merge. It insteat provides examples
> of
> > converting use of VLAs to alloca() would look like.
> >
> > what's the advanta
On 2024-04-06 17:28, Morten Brørup wrote:
From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 April 2024 19.15
RFC sample illustrating simple conversion of VLA to alloca().
Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff
---
[...]
--- a/lib/latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
+++ b/lib/
On 2024-04-04 19:15, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
This series is not intended for merge. It insteat provides examples of
converting use of VLAs to alloca() would look like.
what's the advantages of VLA over alloca()?
* sizeof(array) works as expected.
* multi-dimensional arrays are still arrays inst
> >>> @@ -2198,8 +2220,15 @@ txgbe_set_tx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >>> struct txgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> >>> #endif
> >>> txq->tx_free_thresh >= RTE_PMD_TXGBE_TX_MAX_BURST) {
> >>> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Using simple tx code path");
> >>> - dev->tx_pkt_bur
14 matches
Mail list logo
