Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/39] examples/l2fwd: convert to new ethdev offloads API

>>+.ignore_offload_bitfield = 1, >>+.offloads = DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP, > >It is not directly related to the patch. >May be I miss something, but it looks like there is no way to say that >"I always strip CRC and cannot preserve it". Yes this is right. Not exposing the C

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: Fix typo in qat.rst

Signed-off-by: Billy O'Mahony --- doc/guides/cryptodevs/qat.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/cryptodevs/qat.rst b/doc/guides/cryptodevs/qat.rst index cb17b6b..c8ef378 100644 --- a/doc/guides/cryptodevs/qat.rst +++ b/doc/guides/cryptodevs/qat.rst @

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: Add useful comment to _sym_session

Signed-off-by: Billy O'Mahony --- lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h index dade554..6edb468 100644 --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h ++

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_ctrlmbuf_init() and CTRL_MBUF_FLAG are not used - shouldn't they be removed and deprecated ?

Hi all, >Let's see if someone complains, and if no, we can plan to remove it >for 17.11. Well, unless I missed it, I did not encounter any complaints, and 17.11 was already released. And the status is of course the same (meaning that in the DPDK tree it is not used). Maybe now that 17.11 was just