[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_pmd_init_all: initialize non-PCI PMDs provided by EAL

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi John, > > 2014-04-10 10:41, John W. Linville: > > These PMDs were being initialized by the EAL layer, but many apps were > > relying on the return value of rte_pmd_init_all to indicate that > > ethernet interfaces were available

[dpdk-dev] I350 drops packet on rte_eth_tx_burst()

I think if you just forward the packets there should be no tx failure. If you instruct the core to send the packet in burst, the tx rate is higher than 10Gbps as the core is too powerful.? ---Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com To add to my previous mail. only upto 544 packets are a

[dpdk-dev] Weird behavior of DPDK - ongoing problem

Hi guys, I am still struggling to find a solution for a problem each time I face from different angle (already wrote few posts). Now I think it is some kind of DMA problem. I am modifying l2fwd example to collect packet flow from high speed ethernet device and store it in file, this is why I use

[dpdk-dev] I350 drops packet on rte_eth_tx_burst()

Hai Chae-yong Chong, Thanks on the reply. But I'm nor actually forwarding packets. I'm crafting my own packets in mbuf's (74 byte packets all) and sending it using ret = rte_eth_tx_burst(port_ids[lcore_id], 0, m_pool,burst_size); When burst_size is 1, it does work. Work in the sense the NIC wil