Hi,
I am looking at the DPDK implementation for the CRC hash function using Intel
intrinsics. Shouldn't the order of the arguments being passed to
_mm_crc32_u32 be reversed ?
http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__hash__crc_8h.html
For a quick reference, here is the code with Actual and Modified calls.
--- a/mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk
+++ b/mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ ifeq ($(KERNELRELEASE),)
# merge all CFLAGS
CFLAGS := $(CPU_CFLAGS) $(EXECENV_CFLAGS) $(TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS)
$(MACHINE_CFLAGS)
-CFLAGS += $(TARGET_CFLAGS)
+CFLAGS += $(TARGET_CFLAGS) -fPIC
On Sat, Dec 7, 201
07/12/2013 16:02, Romulo Rosa :
> Thanks for the feedback. I compiled the DPDK with the -fPIC option. Is
> there any specific location in the Makefile DPDK where should I put the
> -fPIC option?
You can use EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fPIC on the command line.
--
Thomas
Just to record how I solved the problem for those who might have the same
problem. Then run the command / configure - enable-kvm - dpdkdir = / path /
to / dpdk - target-list = x86_64-softmmu
--- a/dpdk-ovs/qemu/config-host.mak 2013-12-09 09:05:04.401122670 -0200
+++ b/dpdk-ovs/qemu/config-host.mak
Hello guys, thanks for the help. Yesterday I could compile with-fPIC
however'm already trying to solve another problem in compiling QEMU. I had
the same problem compiling ovs. Jyotiswarup Raiturkar helped me with OVS
and I'm trying to adapt the solution to this case. If you already know how
to appr
5 matches
Mail list logo