Hi,
I have DPDK 1.5 configured on my machine, I have also configured the rump
kernel tcpip stack.
Now, to check whether the setup works, I started *TCP Server
application*on another machine and connected the LAN cable to the port
which is
controlled by DPDK.
And I am running *TCP client applicatio
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for reply.
The kernel has older version of PF than the one released on sf.net. So
I'm checking the sf.net release.
If the change is limited in DPDK then it is controllable. But now it
affects Intel's PF driver, I don't even know how to push the feature
to Intel. The driver on sf
Hi,
I am doing experiments with SR-IOV + passthrough on 82599.
My expectation is to have VT on and DCB off, under which
configuration, the total 128 TX queues will be split into 32 pools,
each has 4 queues.
With latest driver ixgbe-3.18.7, PF can be set with 16 pools, each has
4 queues with these
16/10/2013 14:18, jigsaw :
> Therefore, to add support for multiple queues per VF, we have to at
> least fix the PF driver, then add support in DPDK's VF driver.
You're right, Linux PF driver have to be updated to properly manage
multiple queues per VF. Then the guest can be tested with DPDK or w
Thanks Stephen and Vladimir. Appreciate the quick response.
Thanks,
Sambath
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By default, you can't poll same queue on same port from different lcores.
> If you need poll same queue on several lcores use locks to avoid race
> co
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:32:33 -0700
Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a test dpdk application with 2 lcores receiving packets
> using rte_eth_rx_burst API. Is this a supported packet processing model.
> The reason I am asking is I am running into some trouble with this model
Hi,
I have a test dpdk application with 2 lcores receiving packets
using rte_eth_rx_burst API. Is this a supported packet processing model.
The reason I am asking is I am running into some trouble with this model.
Thanks,
Sambath
7 matches
Mail list logo
