Hi all,
I will prepare and start a VOTE for Doris 1.0.0
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
在 2022-03-19 22:03:39，"陈明雨" 写道：
>Thanks for Willem's review.
>And yes, the licenses of all thirdparties that Doris depends on are compatible
>with APLv2.
>Some of them
>
>
>---Original---
>From: "陈明雨"Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2022 20:03 PM
>To: "doris-dev"Subject: [DISCUSS] Doris binary release preparation
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>we are going to make a "binary release" of Doris 1.0.
>
>The purpose of starting th
Thanks for Willem's review.
And yes, the licenses of all thirdparties that Doris depends on are compatible
with APLv2.
Some of them are dual licenses and I have chosen the one that is compatible
with APLv2.
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
chenmin...@apache.org
At 2022-03-19 20
this is good idea. what about manager and connectors?
---Original---
From: "??"
+1
I think this will be a good start, the various problems encountered by the
community in compiling doris will be solved, lowering the threshold of doris
installation and deployment, looking forward to the release of the 1.0 binary
installer.
Jiafeng.Zhang
Email ：jiafengzh...@apache.org
-
I just found there is a License file of LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt in the
licenses directory.
It was introduced by the blow License.
CDDL + GPLv2 with classpath exception -- licenses/LICENSE-CDDL-1.0.txt
& licenses/LICENSE-GPLv2-CE.txt
After checking the explanation here[1], I think it's fine for us to
Hi all,
we are going to make a "binary release" of Doris 1.0.
The purpose of starting this discussion is to ask for help in reviewing whether
the binary release related preparations are correct.
The main purpose is to review the composition of the final output package: (see
the attachment, it
