Re: [Discuess][DSIP] Using global dict to accelerate query that have low cardinality string

Hi Guolei, I have some questions for this. 1. I think we cannot trust users completely, so we should add a protection mechanism for global dictionary. For example, fallback to raw string processing when entries in dictionary are too many. 2. Should we consider local dictionary instead of global dic

Re: [Discuess][DSIP] Using global dict to accelerate query that have lowcardinality string

+1 Nice work! -- Original -- From: GuoLei Yi

[Discuess][DSIP] Using global dict to accelerate query that have low cardinality string

*Issue Description:* In Doris, many dimension columns are string type with low cardinality (cardinality < 1024), such as some status codes, provinces, regions, genders, etc. During group by or join operation, it has to make a hash table in the form of strings. The efficiency is relatively low. Thr

Re: [Discuss][DSIP] Add Row Policy support

Nice work This is also a function that many community users want -- Original -- From: stalary https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/issues/7540 There will be 2 stages: 1. Design a new set of Policy syntax     a) create policy     b) drop policy     c) show p

Re:[Discuss][DSIP] Add Row Policy support

Nice work! I created DSIP-009[1] for it. You can write more details in it. And this issue[2] is most in Chinese, I think we should translate it into English in DSIP. Besides the user interface, I would like to know more about how to implement it. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display

[Discuss][DSIP] Add Row Policy support

Dear All, I’d like to add row policy support to Doris, column policy will also be supported in the future. Sometimes we need permission control not only at the table level, but also at the row level, column level. At present, many users need to parse SQL and rewrite sql on out of doris or

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Doris Manager v1.0.0 rc03 for Apache Doris(Incubating)

Hi all, Thanks to everyone participating in this release vote of Release Apache Doris Manager v1.0.0 rc03 for Apache Doris(Incubating) The vote PASSES with 3 (+1 binding) and no +0 or -1 vote. binding: - Mingyu Chen - Ling Miao - Zhengguo Yang - Jiafeng Zhang The vote thread: https

Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 回复的原邮件 发件人 mailto:yiguo...@gmail.com";>GuoLei Yi

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

> BTW, I have a small problem, currently BE UT, BE UT, P0 regression, Incubator > Doris UT are all running with personal accounts, the risk of whether they can > ? > continue to run, and also need the account password to view the failure > information, so it is not very convenient, can you migra

Re:回复：[DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

> Maybe we should add a test to confirm clang compatibility? Some codes cannot > be compiled with clang, but can be compiled with gcc.I will make this test -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org 在 2022-04-25 16:38:32，"952130278" 写道： >Maybe we should add a test t

Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 李德 l...@apache.org On 2022/04/25 08:13:20 GuoLei Yi wrote: > Hello everyone, with the increasing number of pull requests, we need to > strictly control the code merge process. I plan to turn on "requested" CI > checks, that is, when all "requested" CI checks of a PR pass, the code can > be mer

Re:[DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 | | stalary | | stal...@163.com | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制 On 04/25/2022 16:13，GuoLei Yi wrote： Hello everyone, with the increasing number of pull requests, we need to strictly control the code merge process. I plan to turn on "requested" CI checks, that is, when all "requested" CI checks of a PR pass, t

Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 -- Original -- From: GuoLei Yi

Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

> BTW, I have a small problem, currently BE UT, BE UT, P0 regression, Incubator Doris UT are all running with personal accounts, the risk of whether they can continue to run, and also need the account password to view the failure information, so it is not very convenient, can you migrate to the off

Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 BTW, I have a small problem, currently BE UT, BE UT, P0 regression, Incubator Doris UT are all running with personal accounts, the risk of whether they can continue to run, and also need the account password to view the failure information, so it is not very convenient, can you migrate to th

??????[DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

Maybe we should add a test to confirm clang compatibility? Some codes cannot be compiled with clang, but can be compiled with gcc. -- -- ??:

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

> 4. I can not login to the new TeamCity. The CI tools should easily accessible to all contributors. You can click "login as guest" And later I think the PPMC member should have admin privilege. -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org 在 2022-04-25 16:30:31，"ling mia

??????[DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 --  -- ??: "dev"

Re: [DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

1. FE code format should be "requested" in the future. 2. There are some duplicate checks should be removed such as: Incubator Doris UT. 3. I recommend keeping the original P0 check until the P0 case is migrated. 4. I can not login to the new TeamCity. The CI tools should easily accessible to al

Re:[DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

+1 -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org At 2022-04-25 16:13:20, "GuoLei Yi" wrote: >Hello everyone, with the increasing number of pull requests, we need to >strictly control the code merge process. I plan to turn on "requested" CI >checks, that is, when all "re

[DISCUSS] Add requested CI check for Pull Requests

Hello everyone, with the increasing number of pull requests, we need to strictly control the code merge process. I plan to turn on "requested" CI checks, that is, when all "requested" CI checks of a PR pass, the code can be merged. The following admissions will be forced on: 1. BE Code Formatter /