Re: Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

> But I would like to have a lower threshold to help the Doris community quickly establish a mechanism for DSIP. This is equivalent to a cold start process. In the meantime, PMC members will help with the translation of the Chinese documentation. Personally, I will not suggest changing the normal

Re: Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

This will be a useful part and I have one more suggestion. We should re-organize our roadmap with DIP just like Apache Airflow community . This will help developers a lot to understand what we are doing

Re: Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

Same as this PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/8393/files Ling Miao 陈明雨 于2022年3月11日周五 14:02写道： > 1. For the existed or developing feature, this depends on the situation, > such as the subsequent vectorization transformation related to Compaction > or Stream load, I think it is

Re:Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

1. For the existed or developing feature, this depends on the situation, such as the subsequent vectorization transformation related to Compaction or Stream load, I think it is necessary to form a DSIP. 2. How to ensure that this rule can be implemented for a long time? As reviewers, we can ask f

Re: be异常退出

当发生宕机时，你可以在be.out里找到这样的堆栈，这种是有效的信息 PC: @ 0x25fd94b tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::FetchFromOneSpans() *** SIGSEGV (@0x0) received by PID 71566 (TID 0x7f46785f8700) from PID 0; stack trace: *** @ 0x7f46e6dea5d0 (unknown) @ 0x25fd94b tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::FetchFromO

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

> How to ensure that this rule can be implemented for a long time? Maybe we can review the wiki is filled every month by hosting regular developer conferences. We can put the writing DIP wiki in the development process description document. (Just like the development process description for other

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

+1 I have two more questions. Frist: For many projects that have been already completed or doing, do I need to supplement this wiki? Such as Vectorization or Stability optimization of Load Process . Second: How to ensure that this rule can be implemented for a long time? Maybe we can review the wik

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

It's great to compose the design document and review the document with google doc. My suggestion is once we finish the review process it is better to use ASF wiki to host these documentation. Because some people may have some trouble to access the google doc. Just my 2 cents. Willem Jiang Twitte

Re:Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

Thanks for you suggestions: 1. About language: I agree that using Chinese exclusively will not promote diversity in the community. But I would like to have a lower threshold to help the Doris community quickly establish a mechanism for DSIP. This is equivalent to a cold start process. In the mea

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

Besides, the wiki page from apache org is a good place to share the design idea, but it is not a perfect tool for others to comment and discuss. we cannot just select the specific line to share the thoughts from reviewers. In general, the wiki page is friendly for writers but it's not for rev

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

> Probably most of the current Doris development comes from China, so we do not refuse to use Chinese to write DSIP, because when describing some complex content, it may be > easier to express clearly in Chinese. > For DSIPs written in Chinese, Doris PMC members will assist with English translation

Re: Re: [Volunteer recruitment] Open source the P0 test

> We may need some internal discussion about. OK BTW, Looking forward to the first step in improving stability after P0 is open sourced. Volunteer Recruitment Closed Ling Miao 陈明雨 于2022年3月10日周四 18:33写道： > This P0 test is currently belongs to Baidu, inc. > We may need some internal discussion

Re:Re: [Volunteer recruitment] Open source the P0 test

This P0 test is currently belongs to Baidu, inc. We may need some internal discussion about. But IMO, P0 is a good start to improve our regression test cases. -- 此致！Best Regards 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen Email: chenmin...@apache.org At 2022-03-10 17:08:44, "ling miao" wrote: >Sorry for the Misspel

??????[Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

+1  --  -- ??: "dev" https://cwiki.apache.org/c

?????? [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

+1 This is a very good way to facilitate community member participation and community management --  -- ??: "dev"

Re: [Volunteer recruitment] Open source the P0 test

Sorry for the Misspell At present, the new testing framework of Doris has been integrated into the community. We hope to recruit a volunteer to help us open source the P0 level tests. Purpose: 1. Contributors can pre-test P0 cases through scripts before submitting code. 2. When the P0 pipeline fai

[Volunteer recruitment] Open source the P0 test

At present, the new testing framework of Doris has been integrated into the community. We hope to recruit a volunteer to help us open source the P0 level tests. Purpose: 1. Contributors can pre-test P0 through thread scripts and casts before submitting code. 2. When the P0 pipeline fails, the faile

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

+ 1 agree with DIP. The DIP is unified in the wiki directory, which is convenient for management and community people can quickly participate. Ling Miao Willem Jiang 于2022年3月10日周四 16:21写道： > +1 for this DIP to collect the improvement proposals. > My suggestion is create a subdirectory for the D

Re: [Discuss] About Doris Improvement Proposals

+1 for this DIP to collect the improvement proposals. My suggestion is create a subdirectory for the DIP to hold all the DIPs. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 1:25 PM 陈明雨 wrote: > > Hi All: > I would like to start using "Doris Improvement Proposals(DSI