On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:52 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I think that the events of the last several months have clearly shown a lack
> of awareness, knowledge and (and some level) appreciation (adherence) to The
> Apache Way. It would be useful, I think, if this was a focused effort w/i the
>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 4:05 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Jul 16, 2019, at 5:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:52 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> I think that the events of the last several months have clearly shown a
&
I've been thinking of this style of even a lot recently.
Basically an ASF bootcamp for students and the like who want to break
into open source but don't quite know how.
Have a day and a place with a lot of existing ASF committers/PMC
around and an objective of having your first real commit accep
A bit of a belated reply -- but this looks very interesting to me on
both open source and business sized (my company -- ZEDEDA is right in
the middle of all this change).
So... a question: how can I sign up for this event?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:26 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
>
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:15 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I've made two posts on this list in the past couple of days regarding
> the rising ACL effort and my concerns about it.
>
> I *desperately* want this kind of grass-roots enthusiast community
> effort. I do NOT want to kill it. But I've learned
Very nicely done! Kudos!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:10 AM Swapnil M Mane wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Hope you are doing well.
> Recently I have experimented with a video on Apache News Roundup.
> Here is what happened this month in Apache.
>
> https://youtu.be/daud_G6YyV0
>
> I am als
This is really amazing! Huge kudos to all who made it happen -- I wish we
had more ALCs like that!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 4:09 PM Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> This is Willem Jiang, the chapter leader of Apache Local Community
> Beijing[1], and I am beyond thrilled to share wit
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 5:19 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> I had a similar idea some years back, but with a slightly more
> tongue-in-cheek approach.
>
>From a peanut gallery: whatever we do THE ABOVE is the attitude I would
advocate -- take it seriously and you stand a real chance of ruining your
com
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 6:03 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
> I propose to modify the ICLA to include the submitter's github id. These
> days, with GitHub, projects propose new committers and all they really know
> about them is the contributors' github id. This sometimes makes it
> challenging for S
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 7:21 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> I understand that GitHub now recommends (not enforced) that people use a
> single
> GitHub id for all of their interactions on the service, and to specifically
> delete all
> accounts except for the one account. They can then
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 8:57 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> What’s the ask here? Once someone has an Apache id then they can map their
> ids using id.Apache.org? They also need to enable 2FA in GitHub.
>
> While more awkward any committer can use gitbox.com.
>
> Maybe, submitting an ICLA should also be
Jim said:
> IMO, the foundation and the project should do nothing associated with
this. It should neither encourage or condone it. In no way should we enter
into any agreement, contract, whatever, w/ Tidelift. If Tidelift wishes to
work independently and directly w/ people, that's fine. But having
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 3:51 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Jared, I like your descriptions! If you replace sponsor with vendor it should
> be very familiar to us all!
First of all: +1 to Jarek's idea.
Second of all, now that I have the board's blessing to go and explore
the Tidelift-like situations
Hi!
while the classical ASF communication culture is pretty squarely
centered around mailing lists it has become apparent in recent
years that some of our communities (especially younger ones)
prefer using alternative channels of communication. The range
is pretty wide from Slack to Telegram and W
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:19 AM Zhiyuan Ju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I involved in the Apache APISIX Community since 2019, and I would prefer to
> keep using the mailing list than other ways. There have been
> some challenges like not a friendly way to discuss codes, not every
> volunteer or contributor
Hi tison!
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:06 PM tison wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> I noticed your summary and focus on user-facing channels. Comments inline.
>
> Roman Shaposhnik 于2022年2月22日 周二23:32写道：
>
> > Thanks for all the feedback so far. If I were to summarize what's b
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:13 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >
> >
> > Do any of the mentioned alternatives fulfill those requirements?
> >
>
> I think most - with very little investment on taking backup (same as we do
> with ponymail today).
>
> Two examples:
>
> * http://apache-airflow.slack-archives.
Hi!
over the past couple of years there has been a number
of efforts trying to figure out effective ways of getting funded
for working on ASF projects as individuals and not employees
at companies building on top of these projects.
Chris's recent experience is but one of them:
https://lists.a
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 10:55 PM Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Le dim. 27 févr. 2022 à 21:13, Jarek Potiuk a écrit :
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Do any of the mentioned alternatives fulfill those requirements?
> > >
> >
> > I think most - with very little investment on taking backup (same as we
> do
> > wi
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 11:11 PM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> We just went through this with Log4j and decided that the Tidelift model
> was not compatible with Apache. Hopefully someone on our PMC can provide a
> recap.
>
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but as I remember there wasn't any attempt
to wo
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 11:59 PM Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Le dim. 27 févr. 2022 à 23:11, Jarek Potiuk a écrit :
> >
> > >
> > > It rather seems to me that tools targeted to synchronous
> > > communication are quite bad for asynchronous usage.
> > >
> >
> > I quite disagree, I use slack for async
Hi!
top-posting here, since I'd like to summarize a few points to see where we
can
take this discussion. Before I do that I wanted to thank Bertrand and Jim
for
excellent, short emails/summaries and also special thanks to Chris for an
extremely informative recap of his efforts.
Personally, I'd li
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 9:23 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Le mar. 1 mars 2022 à 20:12, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> > ...Why re-invert the wheel?
> >
> > https://matrix.org/ ...
>
> Would we need to run our own Matrix servers if we want to make it an
> alternative for our projects?
>
> Using https:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:09 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> >> I still fail to understand the reason for looking for alternatives to
> >> MLs for managing ASF projects...
>
> It's less a question of us looking for alternatives, and more a question
> of observing the broader open source community and
Chris, thanks for sort of reviving the old thread I had before the
war: I'm slowly coming back to my more regular Open Source life from
all the craziness of the past two months. Because of that, there's not
much to report back -- but I will share a few points and comment on a
few of yours. Hope thi
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 6:54 PM me wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: A way to keep the name
>
> I think it's a good idea to make such a fund or simply make sure that
> existing efforts (TAC, Outreachy engagement) have some deliberate and
> conscious actions in this direction - knowing the past associa
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:35 PM me wrote:
>
> Roman, welcome to the party!
LOL! Thanks ;-)
> I think the scope of the risk (in terms of “what”) is fairly well understood.
> Did you also estimate the probability of the risks? (i.e. likelihood?)
IIRC mostly the likelihood.
> Do you mind sharing
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> November 8 & 9 will be OpenSource Experience Paris
> (https://www.opensource-experience.com/en/).
>
> I took the opportunity/lead to request a booth for The ASF, that has
> been accepted.
>
> I will be on the booth (of c
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:44 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> as I attended the last set of workshops in pre-pandemic times, it seems the
> European Commission is continuing to try to understand open-source.
> In this quest it seems they are planning on doing a set of workshops on a
>
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 6:27 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> I am also scheduled for the "Workshop 3.4 Exploring practical solutions to
> ensure long term sustainability of open source software".
I'm now signed up to be on the:
"1.4: Identifying, fixing and managing critical open source software
used
On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 11:20 PM Niels Basjes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given the recent events around twitter I had this crazy idea:
> What if the ASF would run their own Mastodon instance under the apache.org
> domain?
>
> Primarily this would make it possible for all projects to have a clean
> account
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So while I really appreciate all of the folks stepping up to volunteer for
> other stuff, I won't have anything to give you to do, unless you want to
> persuade your employer to throw money at us. Or persuading interesting
> people to submit int
Ping! Any chance you clarify the sponsorship question I've sent you?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> It's in svn, however it's in the Foundation repo, which is member-only, as
> there's foundation-confidential info in there as well. If you have a
> suggestion
I'd like to through my hat in the ring as far as Bigtop and Giraph are
concerned.
Also, for as long as nobody's willing to handle Spark -- I'd be more than happy
to do that as well.
Trouble is -- wiki doesn't let me login: RomanShaposhnik
Same account I use for wiki.apache.org/incubator/
Thanks,
Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
the proposal in our given areas or weight them
somehow?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> As I am quite new to this proc
Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a few questions:
1. I assume that I can wake up in the morning (PST) tomorrow
and whatever is submitted is it. I
Buy now I've reviewed most of the talks submitted in the areas
I'm familiar with (mostly Hadoop ecosystem). Beyond the feedback
I left in the system two trends emerged:
1. there are a lot of different talks submitted around Hadoop's YARN
2. there are a lot of different talks submitted around
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I confirm this impression.
>
> There is a similar glut of Cordova talks. In the Cordova talks, however,
> many of the submissions are from the same few people and the talks are
> very, very similar.
>
> A smaller set of near duplicates occurs
Would be more than happy to help. I'm replying from the email
associated with my google account. Please share the doc.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> If you'd like to help with the CFP process (in addition to, or instead of,
> reviewing talks) one thing you c
I am done with as many as I could slot. The rest look roughly OSGi'sh to me ;-)
I've also reviewed the existing bucketing in the areas I know -- all
looks good to me.
Let me know if any additional help is needed.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hey Rich,
Hi Rich!
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> 3) http://tm3.org/actracks/ is days and proposed tracks each day. Now that
> I'm done with #2, I'm moving on to #3, taking the completed tracks and
> populating the actual schedule in #3. From here, we'll have to either add or
> remove
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
> Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
> introduction from each panel member could be a lot more lively and thereby
> giving for us all.
>
> The community track is all about our communities, so why not do some of the
> t
Very nicely done!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Ok, folks, I've got a draft schedule up at http://tm3.org/actracks and we're
> going to send out speaker notifications based on that. Only missed my
> deadline by two minutes.
>
> Thank you so much, all of you,
This sounds like a really good idea! In fact, if there's any chance for us
to give it a try at ApacheCON EU -- it'll be pretty nice.
Not sure how feasible it is for ApacheCON US, but on a related note:
I've always wondered about combining my two favorite passtimes:
ASF and euro boardgames ;-)
Has
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Hello, folks,
>
> On the schedule for ApacheCon is a community panel. We have an MC - Joe
> Brockmeier - but we don't have a topic. Some topics were suggested a few
> weeks ago, and the one that sounded the most interesting to me - somethi
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Maybe Andrew Bayer instead of me. He is a core committer on Jenkins
> (which has a strong affinity for CD); and jclouds moves faster.
> CloudStack isn't really a CD type of project - at least not yet.
While any panel with Andrew on it is woul
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> For those of you who have agreed to participate in filtering and selecting
> talks for Apachecon EU, the time has arrived.
>
> If you have not yet logged in to the CFP system -
> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/cfp/cfp-list?field_presentation_
I'll take a look today.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Hey, Linked Data folks, I need some last minute help.
>
> http://tm3.org/aceu2014tracks - see Linked Data tab
>
> There are 9 talks marked Accept, 4 talks marked Average.
>
> I can run 12 talks, or I can run 6 talks, but
Being perhaps a late comer to this thread (just got back from vacation)
I need to ask: what is the problem we're trying discuss here?
During my tenure at ASF I've definitely seen non-code contributing
project participants being treat with utmost respect and elected
all the way to PMC membership by
ve brevity and typos
>
> From: Melissa Warnkin
> Sent: 8/13/2014 17:04
> To: ComDev
> Cc: Roman Shaposhnik; Sally K; Ross Gardler; Rich Bowen
>
> Subject: Beautiful Drawing by Roman Shaposhnik's Daughter
>
> Well hello community!!
>
> P
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Heya peeps... could community.a.o please do something about the deprecated
> community@apache mailing list? I would suggest it becomes an alias for
> dev@community (and its archive just moves into stasis).
FWIW: I'd be very much +1. Got bitten
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I've received numerous recommendations of other possible keynotes, and I
> need to put these somewhere to track them other than my inbox, and I hope to
> be doing that before the end of this week, so that we can have some
> transparency around t
Here's a crazy suggestion: would there be any interest in having
a legal-centric keynote on the experience of a mid-size open
source-based company with ASF, Apache Lincese, etc?
I have a really wonderful legal councilor partner who is
also an amazing speaker.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> The main reason we do not support git in this workflow is that git does not
> enable single-file checkouts, and that we haven't properly tested gitwcsub
> (a git version of svnwcsub which is the frontend for svnpubsub) for web
> sites yet. If
Hi!
I've been wondering if comdev has its own wiki space.
Looking at http://wiki.apache.org/general/ doesn't
bring anything up. Would appreciate suggestions on
how proceed requesting it.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> I've been wondering if comdev has its own wiki space. Looking at
>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/ doesn't bring anything up. Would appreciate
>> sug
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
>>> The ComDev wiki is (currently) on Confluence not Moin, so the root URL is
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Index
>>
>>
>&g
+ComDev ML
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> So when I see Greg and others just chucking stuff at ComDev, and being
> just "static content", and Ross and others saying "Hey, ComDev already
> has stuff to do and this new stuff isn't necessarily what we plan on",
> it's somethi
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On 02/04/2015 03:42 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>
>> We are discussing again, as it seems to me, what the purpose of the
>> Apachecon is based on talks submitted. And why is that?
>>
>> It appears, at least to me as I have seen the discussions befor
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table
> at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect
> to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their
> place the
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> ...Please, whoever can help with granting -- help!...
>
> I don't think I have karma to do that, worst case you could use
> https://wiki.apache.o
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> Sure. But see, this is me testing the following assumption: given the
>> volunteer resources (myself) ComDev could be a good place to mange
>> pTLP related docum
I can volunteer. What do I need to do? ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Anyone want to volunteer to chair the Community track at ApacheCon?
> Basically, this means taking charge of reviewing the Community talks that
> have been submitted, and selecting the
Ditto here ;-)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> may I request an access to the schedule spreadsheet please?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> BR,
> Alexander
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
>> HI Rich,
>>
>> Could I request acc
or the direct sched link - http://apacheconna2015.sched.org
>> <http://apacheconna2015.sched.org/>
>>
>> Suresh
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:39 AM, jan i wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought the spreadsheet was now "dead" and we us
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> But, during my last 2-3 year absence, has the GitLab[1] option been
> discussed and/or tried? GitLab is open sourced, can run on our infra and
> has many of the essential features of Github.
> But perhaps people are satisfied enough with the
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Oh, this is pretty great! No more running private-list@ or dev-list@ emails
> and counting the subscribers! Thank you very much!
This is an awesome service!
Thanks,
Roman.
Hi!
a recent thread with one of the PMCs pointed out an issue
that I've long wanted to solicit feedback for: what is the ideal
job title for somebody who is payed to help ASF communities
grow?
I have always thought that 'Technical/Community Evangelist, Apache FOO'
would be appropriate, just like
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> I'm -1 on using "Apache Foo" in a job title. It great confusion between the
> paid role and the community role.
> The community role is not attached to a paid role. It is connected to the
> individual.
Like I said -- I conside
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any community
> member no matter what they do.
It is all over LI and resumes. Here's a good example:
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=759319
"Developer
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:08 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
>> wrote:
>>> Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any
>>>
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Also note, a linked in profile or resume is about the individual. It's not an
> official job title.
> Then re-read my original reply.
Now we're just debating semantics. Seriously -- what do you think
'official job tile' is the
Last reply on this thread for today ;-)
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015, at 05:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> As a title provided by a company, I would be against any title that
> incorporates the name of an Apache project. Red Hat, for inst
can we do Penn & Teller routine? ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sure... I'll need a co-host :)
>
>> On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Jim, since you're going to be at ApacheCon this year, are you willing
>> to be the Lightning
Sorry for jumping into the discussion late, but is there a chance for
[semi-]official templates to be available for ACNA15?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 19/03/2015 Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://templates.openoffice.org/en/search?search_api_view
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Twitter just posted the following blog post:
> https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-tweetdeck-teams
Interesting! On a related subject: should we promote the usage of this
for managing all of our project @ASFxxx accounts?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> One doesn't exclude the other. I'd first like us to establish whether
> committership
> to the ComDev code is by invitation only or open to all existing Apache
> committers
> (which I'd prefer).
+1
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> If a project decides not to make a certain individual a committer, the Board
> *will not* step in to police that, as you say. It is the project's decision
> who will be a committer.
Right. At the same time if the hypothetical PMC repeatedly fai
Btw, this is the visualization that I showed to everybody
at BarCamp:
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/05/mapping-apache.html
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:12 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> At ApacheCon, we discussed creating a project visualization tool to
> help folks navigation the e
This is all taken from our DOAP file
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Wow. great stuff! I was wondering how do you get
> the projects-per-language stats? E.g. as a Groovy aficionado I looked at
>
> https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html?language#Groovy
>
> and d
Turns out it was an over-eager corp. marketing that
used sources unrelated to ACNA to figure out "who may
be interested in Geode" (whatever that means).
Apologies for the noise, my initial thought was exactly
along the lines of Melissa's note: whoever got scanned
(which in my mind would be a total
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:19 PM, jan i wrote:
>> I am happy to let me badge be scanned for ACEU, if pivotall becomes a
>> sponsor and even more if the swag is something useful
Working on it!
Thanks,
Roman.
Hi!
while trying to jumpstart robust tracking of
community events for Geode poddling the
best we could do was to embed Google calenar
into our Confluence page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Upcoming+events
This led me to this:
https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/T
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> You can ask infra, but I don't see this as a viable cross project service
> since confluence
> is not standards across all projects. Personally I'd say don't bother. If you
> have a solution
> for Geode then you should stick w
My wiki account name is RomanShaposhnik
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:42 PM, jan i wrote:
> On 19 June 2015 at 22:55, Sally Khudairi wrote:
>
>> Hello Uli and the Apache ComDev team --I hope this message finds you well.
>> Per below, I'm interested in promoting the new Projects page.
>> Can you please let me know if/when we're ready to do
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Sally Khudairi
wrote:
> Thanks, David!
>
> I noticed that Roman tweeted the link yesterday, so I guess the cat is out of
> the bag, as the saying goes.
Btw, the reason I tweeted a 'beta' URL is to get feedback.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote:
> Thanks, Roman.
> To be clear, my statement was not intended to be an attack of any kind!
I really didn't read it like that! Just felt like clarifying, I guess ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> In fact, I told at least one podling that bylaws are a faint smell of
> trouble -- if you have enough conflict to feel the need to write down
> the rules, you might do better working out the reason for the conflict
> than writing down the r
Hi Melissa!
First of all -- I wish you best of luck with the surgery and quickest
possible recovery! We'll surely miss you!
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Melissa Warnkin
wrote:
> Good evening and Happy Friday!!
> Due to medical reasons, I am unable to attend OSCON and "woman the booth";
> th
I'd like to volunteer! Next steps?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> FOSDEM dates have been announced. This is a reminder that several months ago
> we talked about the notion of having an ASF presence at FOSDEM (as opposed
> to just an AOO presence) and people w
This is turning into quite a long thread ;-) Shall we start a wiki
page to coordinate all the FOSDEM activities (same way
we do for ApacheCON)?
I don't seem to have enough karma to start a new page on ComDev
wiki, but I can surely contribute if somebody at least starts a page.
Any takers?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> - if we have enough projects, we can try and make a Apache dev.room (AOO
>> might prefer to be in open editors room). Is it ok if I write to all PMCS
>> asking for interest ?
>
>
> I tend to think like Rich on this: a "virtual" track would
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Tony Stevenson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, at 09:34 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>> That should actually be 'FOSDEM 2016'.
>
> Indeed it should, thanks for pointing it out. It has now been fixed.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Hi,
> I’m curious who here also uses Slack. Besides me, that is.
>
> One thing I’m interested in is, How global is its reach?
I'm very much curious about this as well. Geode users have been
asking whether we can start a slack channel fo
Hi!
while answering a question on release policies and ALv2
I've suddenly realized that I really don't know what is the
legal basis for enforcing release policies we've got
documented over here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
For example, what would be the legal basis for stopping
a 3d
Hi!
I know the question is weird to a point that
I don't even know what's the best place to
ask it.
But here it is ;-) So... if you know somebody
like that or if you know where I can ask this
question more effectively -- please drop me
a note.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:48 AM, jay vyas wrote:
>> ...1) We have to trust PMCs to foster a healthy and transparent roadmap.
>> Exclusive cliques and backchannels should not ever exist in a healthy ASF
>> project, period
>
> That's w
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Asking on the PostgreSQL list is likely the best approach since its one
> prohect/list to our many.
Good point ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> On 8/7/15 7:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> Bill,
>> So I can release "Niclas Hadoop platform, based on Apache Hadoop" ?? I
>> thought the discussion a few years ago was that this was misleading...
>
> No, you cannot. See our actual trademar
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
