Pretty neat.
Could add a send draft to list feature (private@ or dev@ for community review).
Does it support editing by multiple people? Can one person resume a
draft saved by another?
Would be nice to have questions from the previous board feedback
auto-populated to be answered in the current rep
The new reporter wizard helps folks create a board report, but it
doesn't seem to have any of the other features of the current
reporeter.a.o tool. For example, helping them to manage recorded
releases (https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?), view
community health score (https://reporter.apa
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:04 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> On 8/6/19 2:54 AM, Christopher wrote:
> > The new reporter wizard helps folks create a board report, but it
> > doesn't seem to have any of the other features of the current
> > reporeter.a.o tool. For example, he
On 19/08/2019 09:12, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could also please add the Apache Maven Project.
>
> https://www.apache.org/logos/?#maven
That updated logo to use the two feathers is brilliant. I never
noticed before. :)
---
+1 (non-binding) to switching to a git-based website
+0 (non-binding) to switching to Hugo
While I'm more familiar with Jekyll than Hugo, the switch to a
git-based website creates a *super* low bar to contribute to now for
Apache Accumulo, the primary project I contribute to at Apache, that I
thin
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:29 AM Claude Warren wrote:
>
> Sorry I am so late to the party, but life has kept me busy.
>
> I have update the wiki to indicate that I will be manning" ("personing"?)
> the booth.
Peopling. Occupying. Staffing. Crewing. Operating. Working. Defending.
Fortifying. Soldier
Recently, a user contributed a pull request for Accumulo to add
.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
I can see this being useful so that the ASF Code of Conduct is
presented in the GitHub UI. However, I don't think every project needs
to do this.
I propose ComDev work with INFRA to create
https://github.com
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:54 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 6:02 PM Christopher wrote:
> > ...Initially, it could just include a `.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md` file
> > that contains the same content as
> > https://www.apache.org/fou
sitory.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:03 AM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
>
> In Apache Airflow and Kibble we simply link to ASF COC:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
> https://github.com/apache/kibble/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
>
> Tomek
>
> On M
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-Notificationsettingsforrepositories
The PMC must create a new notificati...@community.apache.org list for
this change, if they decide to accept my proposed change.
Thanks!
- Christ
for users who *want* to follow this activity,
they don't necessarily want these messages, because many are already
following the activity on GitHub. "OPT-OUT" makes so much more sense
here.
>
> On 7/6/21 9:26 AM, Christopher wrote:
> > Hi ComDev,
> >
> > I
Sorry, I have a slight correction on my response. I meant to write:
'"OPT-IN" makes so much more sense here.' Sorry for any confusion.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:45 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> To respond to your questions:
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:06 AM Rich Bo
Great discussion, everybody! Here's some thoughts in response to some
of the questions/concerns raised:
People should *not* have to subscribe to the other list in order to
participate in discussions. It should just be for automated notices.
The best practice is, like commits@, have it moderated an
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
[SNIP]
> Tell me why a split discussion is good for the community?
I feel like I didn't do a good enough job of responding to this point,
so to clarify further:
My answer is that it's *not*. However, that problem already exists
with any issue tra
Hi Erik,
Do you have a good understanding of *why* there are more issues being
opened than being closed? If so, that might hint at some possible
solutions.
For example, if you just don't have enough people to write code, then
the PMC could focus on inviting new committers to try to grow the
commu
(Dropped press@ from reply)
I don't find the wording there too confusing if you know that "Projects"
includes both top-level and sub-projects. This seems obvious to me when the
site says "199 committees managing 351 projects", but that could be
clarified further by having it say "199 project manag
At first glance, a big +1. This is one of the better Code of Conduct
policies that I've seen.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As many of you are no doubt aware, we have had on our website, for at
> least 8
I might be interested in volunteering (though, I won't be in Austin).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I know we have a bunch of people who already volunte
the meantime, do you have any experience already?
>
>
I've done some tutoring, but nothing like this.
(Also, friendly note: I prefer "Christopher" :) )
I'll keep an eye on the list.
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
&
build feature. (And would also have the added benefit of only
needing to update the viewer when there's a javadoc security vulnerability,
rather than require every project to patch their javadocs, as I seem to
remember was recently the case.)
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsi
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
> > The main reason we do not support git in this workflow is that git does
> not
> > enable single-file checkouts, and that we haven't properly tested
> gitwcsub
> > (a git version
urces to think about them and
experiment with implementing them for the ASF.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
o email directly from the interface.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi folks,
> as some of you will have noticed, either by the commits I just made or
> conversations going on elsewhere, I have started work on a ne
t tried it. I'd be willing to work
with INFRA to help experiment with it, though (especially if we wanted to
try out the CNAME feature).
More info: https://pages.github.com/
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Christopher wrote:
> All,
>
> Has any thought been put into leveraging GitHub pages for project
> documentation, static site hosting? A lot of www.apache.org is simple
> static content, as are project pages. Since a lot of projects are now usin
legal reasons we have) is that ASF could
provide a similar/compatible mechanism to render these branches in our
infrastructure as an alternative to CMS. That seems like more work for
INFRA, though.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Jay Vyas
wro
topic it's own focus?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> I would love to see a GitLab trial at Apache infrastructure - I feel
> uncomfortable at directing other developers to look at
> http://git-wip-u
+1, with two comments:
1. the projects page on the new site has a link to "Contributors", which is
broken.
2. there's some information linked on the old site about DOAP files and
RSS/Atom feeds, which do not exist (or are not obvious) on the new site.
--
Christopher
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman
> wrote:
> > Opening a new thread...
> >
> > Git without Github is like sex without a partner, sufficient but not very
> > satisfactory. Github option has been explored in the past, and due to
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-03-05 15:42 GMT+01:00 Sebastien Goasguen :
>
> > So FWIW, I never thought about using github pages for our website.
> > I just tried it.
> >
> > Created an orphaned gh-pages in our repo, pushed that. It got mirrored
> > right away and
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
>
> The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
> people who have linked to various parts of the site.
>
> Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine
y.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: GitHub Pages
> >>
> >> Chris,
> >>
> >> The easy summary is that Apache would like to keep apache sites being
> served by apache controlled hardware.
> >>
> >> Github serving pages fails that test
ul.
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 6, 2015, at 14:36, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > Regarding some of the other comments about jekyll... it's not true that
> you
> > need jekyll. You can publish plain HTML or Markdown also.
>
Perhaps we can create a procedure that *isn't* a giant hurdle?
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 11:39 Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 3/12/2015 11:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> > Including community dev as it seems appropriate.
> >
> > Offboarding is equally important as onboarding. The solution as
> > describ
PM, Christopher wrote:
> > Perhaps we can create a procedure that *isn't* a giant hurdle?
> I don't see the gain from doing so. We've had no issues identified that
> this actual solves and it actively goes against my understanding of the
> pro-volunteer nature of the ASF.
>
> regards,
> KAM
>
rsonal
opinion, of course).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
> decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've
> don
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> +1 for GitHub - as Apache Extras are easily mini-communities of one
> or two people and not as clear way in to contribute.
>
>
> GitHub should seriously be considered. Making an apache-extras
> organization there should be straight for
You can just sign in to tweetdeck in the browser, without a special
app: http://tweetdeck.twitter.com/
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Santiago Gala wrote:
> I would be interested in helping with twitter, but I can't find a way
FWIW, my opinion is that the vender should reissue with the SAN.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> The cert in use is for *.apache.org and does not have a Subject Alternate
> Name for just apache.org wit
Neat. @ctubbsii
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:25 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Great! Please follow me @JamesPlusPlus
>
> On Tuesday, June 9, 2015, Sally Khudairi wrote:
>
>> Greetings, Apache Committers!
>>
>> I&#
er, I'm not really all that familiar with the historical need for
DOAP files, what tools actually use them, or the historical
preferences for maintaining them. So, I admittedly may not fully grasp
the scope of the problem/changes being discussed. I'm just thinking
that if we can get rid of the requirement for PMCs to maintain them
(in favor of a web-interface way for PMCs to describe all aspects of
their projects), then I'd like that.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
+1
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015, 07:01 Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Someone mentioned to me that they find the first paragraph of
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html overly broad,
> and I tend to agree.
>
> That paragraph says "this code of conduct governs how we behave in a
I think the content on disk should reflect what's in SCM. However,
would it make sense to move to git instead of SVN instead of moving to
trunk subdir?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:11 PM, sebb wrote:
> The reporter.apache.org code on
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 19:16, Christopher wrote:
>> I think the content on disk should reflect what's in SCM.
>
> Well yes, but that's not what I'm asking.
> I want to get agreement on the proposed layout.
>
>>
l stake in this
endeavor.)
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hiya folks,
>
> I'm the "lucky person" in charge of moving the some 350 projects from Google
> Code to SourceForge.
> This will h
Okay, that's fine. Thanks. I'm sure I can find stuff in the archives.
I just wasn't sure what the final reasoning was. NBD.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> That discussion has been had a number o
You probably want to ask people on the Flume mailing lists:
http://flume.apache.org/mailinglists.html
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Nikhil Gs wrote:
> Hello Apache team,
>
> I am new to hadoop flume environment and I am
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>
>> This looks good.
>>
>> So do I understand any of the commiters editing the site would still
>> need to run Jekyll manually and push (how?), or is there a GitHub like
>> autobu
sn't the typing that is the hard part, it is coming up with the
>> accurate Content.
>>
>> My 2 cents to this never ending debate... ;-)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niclas
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Christopher wrote:
>>
>> > On M
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Coming in late.
>>
>> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
>> release.
>
> Are you sure? When you have a public source control repo, with a
> LICENSE fi
It sounds to me like you're saying that the license under which code is
offered (to anybody who encounters it) is independent of the license
declaration attached to the project.
This makes sense to me, presuming that we still agree that the license
declaration (header or license file) is the best
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> ...Their changes do mean that when people come to the solr-user mailing
>> list looking for help, we sometimes have to refer them to the downstream
>> maintainers, because we can'
It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
restricted
I'm not sure where exactly this discussion should fit, but I know people
have brought up questions about ASF-wide signing of artifacts before, so
I'll just mention it on this list.
Fedora infrastructure has built a project called sigul:
https://fedorahosted.org/sigul/
which they use as part of the
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:10 PM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Christopher wrote on 2/25/16 1:47 PM:
> > I'm not sure where exactly this discussion should fit, but I know people
> > have brought up questions about ASF-wide signing of artifacts before, so
> > I'
I'm not sure if it would work with our mailing lists, but if it does, it'd
be really nice to run HyperKitty. It's a great front-end for mailman lists,
allows linking directly to threads, searching, managing subscriptions,
navigating by dates and threads, finding people across lists, and even
partic
gt; works well ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
> --
> Andy Wenk
> Hamburg - Germany
> RockIt!
>
> GPG public key:
> https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4F1D0C59BC90917D
>
>
>
>
> > On 12 Mar 2016, at 14:31, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
&
It will stop if you unsubscribe by sending an email to
dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016, 20:27 Henry Martinez wrote:
> Please stop emailing mee.
>
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2016, Thamali Wijewardhana <
> thamaliw...@cse.mrt.ac.lk>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am an undergradua
Unsubscribe by sending an email to dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org from
the address you are registered.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:25 PM Esegba Patrick wrote:
> Pls my names are Patrick Esegba. l am no longer interested on apache
> dev. Community . Unsubscribe me.
> Thanks
> Pk.
>
> On 3/2
Other than the outdated reference, are there specific updates you feel
should be made?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:39 PM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> We have a posted anti-harassment policy focused on behavior at in-person
> events, but it's looking a bit outdated since it references ConCom [1]...
>
>
So,
I've noticed that Jenkins views are getting kinda crazy.
https://builds.apache.org/
You might not be able to see all the tabs and craziness until you log on.
(I believe Jenkins uses LDAP for authentication).
In short, we used to have tabs for:
"A-F", etc.
Then, some of those sections got to
Hi all,
I'm not sure a better list to get feedback on, but I wanted to bring
attention to the proposal here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-118
Essentially this is a suggestion to configure the maven-gpg-plugin to sign
using SHA512 as its digest algorithm in the ASF Parent POM, used b
M, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> >
> > Greg, the proposal is for the _Default ASF POM_ to be set up so that
> > _all_ projects would use SHA-512. This is not a question for the Maven
> > PMC.
> >
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Greg Trasuk
> wrote:
> >>
&
*.asc detached signature files stronger.
> Are there any compatibility issues for downstream users with your proposed
> default change? What about for Maven deployment? I assume a newer gpg is
> needed; what would be the new version requirement, and how does this match
> what is availabl
This is a somewhat serious question (but only somewhat).
Does anybody know what the process would be like to petition for a feather
(ASF or otherwise) emoji in unicode? Has anybody tried doing this?
the UTC. Does the ASF
> really want to lump itself in with the people demanding characters for
> 'poop'?
>
> But if you insist, I can send you the process.
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > This is a somewhat serious question (but
Why does reporter use 1 day earlier than JIRA when I use the "Fetch
releases from JIRA" feature?
Also noticed that it says "It's not possible to amend release details", but
that's not true. If you give a different day for the same version, it
overwrites.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:38 PM Christopher wrote:
> Why does reporter use 1 day earlier than JIRA when I use the
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:19 PM sebb wrote:
> On 6 September 2016 at 23:38, Christopher wrote:
> > Why does reporter use 1 day earlier than JIRA when I use the "Fetch
> > releases from JIRA" feature?
>
> What exactly do you mean by that?
>
What I mean is that w
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:21 PM sebb wrote:
> On 7 September 2016 at 22:44, Christopher wrote:
> > Also noticed that it says "It's not possible to amend release details",
> but
> > that's not true. If you give a different day for the same version, it
>
JIRA if JIRA isn't storing that
(even if it does store it, the UI doesn't allow you to specify, so it's
going to default to midnight).
> -- Lefty
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:19 PM sebb wrote:
> &
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:54 PM sebb wrote:
> On 8 September 2016 at 17:18, sebb wrote:
> > On 8 September 2016 at 01:59, Christopher wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:51 PM Lefty Leverenz
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is this a timezone proble
Confirmed fixed on my end (after clearing browser cache). Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:02 PM sebb wrote:
> On 8 September 2016 at 21:54, sebb wrote:
> > On 8 September 2016 at 17:18, sebb wrote:
> >> On 8 September 2016 at 01:59, Christopher wrote:
> >>>
The ASF-owned domains: {repo,repo1,repo2}.maven.apache.org
are all CNAMEs (aliases) for the Sonatype-owned domain:
repo.apache.maven.org, which is a CNAME for maven.map.fastly.net,
which is (apparently) Sonatype's CDN service provider.
The Sonatype-owned domains: {repo1,repo2}.maven.org
are CNAMEs
I wonder if ASF should update its CNAMEs to point to repo1.maven.org
instead of repo.apache.maven.org, since Sonatype lists repo1.maven.org as
Central's canonical location.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM Mark Struberg
wrote:
> This is the domain Apache Maven uses as default repository.
> It is a
natype. It took us
> quite
> > a bit of discussions to reach this agreement and it proved to be a good
> > compromise as far as I can tell.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > > Am 02.12.2016 um 10:41 schrieb Christopher :
> > >
> > > I wonder i
ommunity.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>
> --
Christopher
gnature-algorithms/
> >
> > I don't know who's responsible for this, but my bug was closed because
> it's
> > not the infrastructure team, and so I'm trying here.
> >
> > I suggest we move to SHA2 hashes for all verification purposes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
--
Christopher
members).
In any case, I don't raise this issue to demean the individual whose
profile photo came to my attention... this is not an attack on them. Again,
this is not a witch hunt.
--
Christopher
is ignorant of the impact it must have
> on some readers.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It is surprising to me that a certain individual participant in ASF
> forums
> > seems to be using a swastika a
political
> >
> > > activity,
> >
> > > > > and so on) is not acceptable, regardless if that is a hate
> > organization
> >
> > > > > like the Nazis or more moderate political statements that many may
> >
> > > agree
>
://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apache-big-data-north-america
What are the correct dates? And, for the purposes of traveling, does
anybody know if there's going to be any evening-before or day-after events
planned?
Thanks.
--
Christopher
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>
> --
Christopher
I think you've got the question backwards. The ASF does not really create
projects. Projects create development communities at ASF. So, I think the
real question should be: what makes Apache so appealing to Java-based
projects?
I think the answer to that question is probably "the same things that
Unfortunately, I won't be flying in early enough to attend the BarCamp in
Miami, but I wanted to suggest a possible topic, if anybody attending
wishes to pick it up for discussion there:
Topic:
Establishing and strengthening relationships with downstream packaging
The premise:
Official ASF releas
Looks good.
One suggestion: please fix the time zone translation for the release dates.
The browser is converting the timezone to its local time zone, but these
dates are date/times, they are just dates, and should not be converted
based on time zone. This is annoying because different viewers in
The feature doesn't seem all that different to me than automatic assignment
to component owners in JIRA or other bug trackers, which are useful for
distributing triage. I'm not sure how I feel about requiring coffee reviews
from owners, as a hard prerequisite, though.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017, 04:19 Gr
s/coffee/code/
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017, 08:37 Christopher wrote:
> The feature doesn't seem all that different to me than automatic
> assignment to component owners in JIRA or other bug trackers, which are
> useful for distributing triage. I'm not sure how I feel about requiri
Hi all,
I noticed that Whimsy is doing some helpful QA checks for project sites,
and has a check for "Event" (https://whimsy.apache.org/site/check/events).
This seems to be a check for a link/image to current events. However, the
"current" event image is for the last ApacheCon in Miami (
http://ww
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:49 PM Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Christopher wrote on 8/10/17 3:45 PM:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I noticed that Whimsy is doing some helpful QA checks for project sites,
> > and has a check for "Event" (https://whimsy.apache.org/site/check/eve
That's exactly what we are doing in Fluo. We ask if it's okay to tweet
about their contribution, and what their Twitter handle is, if it is okay.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017, 06:02 sebb wrote:
> I think you should ask the person first.
> Not all will want such publicity.
>
> On 9 November 2017 at 09:48,
Hi ComDev, quick question: [1] suggests committers should be signed up for
the private mailing list. However, [2] indicates it's a PMC-only mailing
list. The latter makes more sense, since voting on committers to join the
PMC could result in a socially awkward situation if said committer is
subscri
I never got a response to this inquiry. I think the docs are still
inconsistent.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:21 PM Christopher wrote:
> Hi ComDev, quick question: [1] suggests committers should be signed up for
> the private mailing list. However, [2] indicates it's a PMC-only mailing
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2017 02:21 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > Hi ComDev, quick question: [1] suggests committers should be signed up
> for
> > the private mailing list. However, [2] indicates it's a PMC-only mailing
> >
The recently updated checksum policy from infra means more people should be
using tools like sha512sum or shasum (or even sha1sum) instead of md5sum,
but the instructions for users to verify releases:
https://www.apache.org/info/verification only mention md5sum tools. They
should be updated to incl
Regarding the release date in the future, the release date is the date it
was uploaded to the mirror distribution channel. It can't be in the future
if you're responding to the email reminder.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 05:53 Julian Foad wrote:
> About https://reporter.apache.org:
>
> 1) What is the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:30 AM sebb wrote:
> On 12 April 2018 at 15:11, Christopher wrote:
> > Regarding the release date in the future, the release date is the date it
> > was uploaded to the mirror distribution channel. It can't be in the
> future
> > if y
or what purpose?
Thanks,
Christopher
[1]: https://projects.apache.org/create.html
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:48 PM sebb wrote:
> On 17 April 2018 at 19:04, Christopher wrote:
> > I've noticed some TLPs don't have DOAP files, and many others are not
> > well-maintained.
>
> True
>
> > As I understand it, these were once used to populate
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:16 PM sebb wrote:
> On 17 April 2018 at 20:05, Christopher wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:48 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 17 April 2018 at 19:04, Christopher wrote:
> >> > I've noticed some TLPs don't have D
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
