In the past we have avoided linking to whimsy in public facing
documentation. It encourages people to dig to find what they can find.
Whimsy is *not* a place that we want people digging, IMHO, and if there's
alternate (there is) we should use it.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 19:47 sebb wrote:
> On Sat,
> On Jun 26, 2023, at 05:29, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> In the past we have avoided linking to whimsy in public facing
> documentation. It encourages people to dig to find what they can find.
> Whimsy is *not* a place that we want people digging, IMHO, and if there's
> alternate (there is) we shoul
psteitz commented on PR #125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/125#issuecomment-1608391078
This is really nice work. On first read, I though there were things missing
re challenges, but everything is there. I guess people who know how to write
know how to write :)
Re
