On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 15:18, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
>
> I see, we don't have the same vocabulary but the same intent
>
> https://projects.apache.org/ looks much more accurate now
The figures are accurate in relation to the data used by the site, but
the page still does not give the full picture as
I see, we don't have the same vocabulary but the same intent
https://projects.apache.org/ looks much more accurate now
Le lundi 9 juin 2025, 11:16:43 CEST sebb a écrit :
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 08:07, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> > Le lundi 9 juin 2025, 00:15:30 CEST sebb a écrit :
> > > On Sun, 8 Jun
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 08:07, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
>
> Le lundi 9 juin 2025, 00:15:30 CEST sebb a écrit :
> > On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 22:19, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> > > you're right, I don't remember why it made sense to list these more than
> > > 10
> > > years ago: it was there in the initial impor
Le lundi 9 juin 2025, 00:15:30 CEST sebb a écrit :
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 22:19, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> > you're right, I don't remember why it made sense to list these more than
> > 10
> > years ago: it was there in the initial import
> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=165
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 22:19, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
>
> you're right, I don't remember why it made sense to list these more than 10
> years ago: it was there in the initial import
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=1651762
>
> it seems it's because it started by counting PMC cha
you're right, I don't remember why it made sense to list these more than 10
years ago: it was there in the initial import
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=1651762
it seems it's because it started by counting PMC chairs, with notions of TLP
and sub-projects...
nowadays it's
5 special committees are currently included under "open source initiatives".
I'm not sure these can be classed as such (and they are not included
in the total).
I think they should just be dropped: do they play any part in the rest
of the site?
Also, the 300+ number looks wrong, because the numbe