On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> ...we should probably cross post announcements of GSoC deadlines to both lists
> to ensure we don't miss some mentors who only care about GSoC
Agreed, and also ask GSoC mentors to subscribe to both lists, and
watch at least messages marke
On 06/01/2010 08:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
I understand we mean to continue using code-awards@ for GSoC
coordination (assuming GSoC happens again), and I wonder if we
shouldn't discuss as many GSoC-related things as possible here
instead, to give that more visibility (as code-awards@ is
Hi,
I understand we mean to continue using code-awards@ for GSoC
coordination (assuming GSoC happens again), and I wonder if we
shouldn't discuss as many GSoC-related things as possible here
instead, to give that more visibility (as code-awards@ is not publicly
visible).
I suggest using code-awar
