Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org

I agree too. Mxml has been around for sometime but it is specific to certain PMCs and is more a file format like Yaml. I wonder more about how we classify projects and project product based on whether or not the system consists of components and/or a service. Language makes more sense for descr

Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org

I agree with Sebb, MXML is an XML _vocabulary_. Gary On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 9:55 AM sebb wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:36, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > > > Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is > > that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it? >

Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org

On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:36, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > > Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is > that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it? AFAICT MXML is a domain-specific superset of XML. I don't think that deserves a separate language category

Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org

Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it? Virus-free.www.avast.com

Re: Valid languages for projects.apache.org

ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that. The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-) Gary On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb wrote: > There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in the > current valid list. > > These are: > > BASH/Bas