Re: New Committer Orientation

I'll hit you up if I'm going. I'll ask work. If you're ever in Berlin, let me know. :) On 17 January 2014 15:05, Rich Bowen wrote: > Somehow I managed to post this message twice. There's lots of info and > discussion in the *other* thread about this. But, in general, what Ross > said. :) > > Spea

Re: New Committer Orientation

Somehow I managed to post this message twice. There's lots of info and discussion in the *other* thread about this. But, in general, what Ross said. :) Speaking of which, FOSDEM, Jan 30-Feb 4. Come have a beer with me. :) --Rich On 01/15/2014 03:03 PM, Noah Slater wrote: party@? On 13 Janu

Re: New Committer Orientation

Humbedooh just clarified that it is a non-archived list, which is why I couldn't find it on mail-archives. Thanks! On 17 January 2014 14:12, Noah Slater wrote: > How might I sign up for receiving such mails? > > On 17 January 2014 07:34, Ross Gardler wrote: >> party@ is used for syncing up with

Re: New Committer Orientation

How might I sign up for receiving such mails? On 17 January 2014 07:34, Ross Gardler wrote: > party@ is used for syncing up with folks when travelling. Send a mail to > party@ with "I'll be in X on ..., want to meet up for dinner or beer or > something" and you will often find people to entertain

Re: New Committer Orientation

party@ is used for syncing up with folks when travelling. Send a mail to party@ with "I'll be in X on ..., want to meet up for dinner or beer or something" and you will often find people to entertain you in a strange town Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Senior Technology Evangelist Microsoft Open Technol

Re: New Committer Orientation

Nearest ComDev have is http://community.apache.org/committers/ best .org page is http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Senior Technology Evangelist Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation On 13 January 2014 11:40, Rich Bowen wrote

Re: New Committer Orientation

party@? On 13 January 2014 20:40, Rich Bowen wrote: > Do we have a New Committer Orientation page somewhere? I ask because I just > mentioned the party@ list to someone and they had never heard of it, despite > being around the Foundation for a long time. Clearly, we're falling down on > the job

RE: New Committer Orientation

- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 07:58 To: dev Subject: Re: New Committer Orientation Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: > ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept > subscribe-play@play-subscribe and i

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 04:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: >> ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept >> subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in >> https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe... > > I do see "party" in the s

Re: New Committer Orientation

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > ...Whimsy just doesn't offer committers the > ability to subscribe to lists through it just yet (There's a big TODO in > the source code). I'll ask Sam if/when this can be addressed... For now, a mention of this limitation at https://whimsy.a

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 14 January 2014 17:19, Rich Bowen wrote: > That should be party-subscribe not subscribe-party. > thx, I finally got a confirmation, replied to the confirmation and are now waiting for the "welcome" mail. I assume that waits in some moderator queue. rgds jan I. > > --Rich > > > On 01/14/201

Re: New Committer Orientation

That should be party-subscribe not subscribe-party. --Rich On 01/14/2014 10:40 AM, jan i wrote: Meant of course "party" not "play" sorry for the confusion. rgds jan I. On 14 January 2014 16:38, jan i wrote: On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen wrote: On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wr

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 10:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe... I do see "party" in the subscribe option

Re: New Committer Orientation

Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, jan i wrote: > ...seems to be an insider ML, is does not accept > subscribe-play@play-subscribe and its not listed in > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe... I do see "party" in the subscribe options at https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscri

Re: New Committer Orientation

Meant of course "party" not "play" sorry for the confusion. rgds jan I. On 14 January 2014 16:38, jan i wrote: > > > > On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> >> On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: >> >>> On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: >>> >>> FWIW, I don't know

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 14 January 2014 16:18, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: > >> On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: >> >> FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) >>> >>> Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did >> not >> know about

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 04:25 AM, jan i wrote: On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did not know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is correct It

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 01/14/2014 02:15 AM, Lefty Leverenz wrote: Why isn't party@ included in the archives under the ASF-wide lists section? I don't believe it's publicly archived, because it tends to contain things like travel plans, phone numbers, and so on, that we

Re: New Committer Orientation

Hi, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM, jan i wrote: > ...Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did not > know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is correct... As per http://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html it's "where people plan how t

Re: New Committer Orientation

On 14 January 2014 09:50, Issac Goldstand wrote: > FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) > Could someone please spend a few words what party@ covers, I too did not know about it. The word implies a lot, but I am not sure my idea is correct rgds jan I. > > On 13/01/2014 21:43, Ri

Re: New Committer Orientation

FWIW, I don't know about party@, so sorry, Rich :-) On 13/01/2014 21:43, Rich Bowen wrote: > Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because > I just mentioned the party@ list to someone and got a virtual blank > stare. We're clearly falling down on the job if folks don't

Re: New Committer Orientation

Why isn't party@ included in the archives under the ASF-wide lists section? (Presumably it means pa...@apache.org, but that wasn't obvious on the incubatorpage so I didn't join the list when I became a co

Re: New Committer Orientation

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > Do we have a page somewhere for New Committer Orientation? I ask because I > just mentioned the party@ list to someone and got a virtual blank stare Not one page...*three* (sigh) : http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html http:/