RE: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes

2015-02-18 Thread Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
F see in ApacheCon. Their overall mission in this regard is aligned with our own. Ross -Original Message- From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:42 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes On 02/18/2015 04:28

Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes

2015-02-18 Thread jan i
en.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:22 AM > To: dev@community.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes > > > > On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, jan i wrote: > >> >* Clearly explain the role of the ASF vs the role of the LF. We are > >> >responsible

Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes

2015-02-18 Thread Rich Bowen
On 02/18/2015 04:28 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: However, I do think LF need to set a tone for the event. What tracks do they want (meaning what will sell). They need to market the event (actually sell it). They need to provide the infrastructure support to enable our volunteers to

RE: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes

2015-02-18 Thread Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
owen.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:22 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, jan i wrote: >> >* Clearly explain the role of the ASF vs the role of the LF. We are >> >responsible for content, and only content, LF i

Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes

2015-02-18 Thread Rich Bowen
On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, jan i wrote: >* Clearly explain the role of the ASF vs the role of the LF. We are >responsible for content, and only content, LF is responsible for everything >else, and we need to stay out of their way and let them run a show. This is >hard for us, as we are tinkerers b

Re: [ApacheCon] Keeping notes

2015-02-18 Thread jan i
On 18 February 2015 at 15:16, Rich Bowen wrote: > As we go through this process again and make a lot of the same mistakes I > made the last two times, I'm trying really hard to keep notes so that when > I hand this over to someone else, they don't have to figure it out all over > again. I'm sure