On Friday, February 5, 2016, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> a podling recently asked me why:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
> are only available to commiters. I see
> no reason why, bu
No Worry have Test , will longer Test To Found all Parameters And Sound ,
really Great Sequenzer better Sound we By Any Apps i am use for Ableton live
this Sequenzer is The Best By live Play Ty Roman happy Weekend 👏
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 13.03.2016 um 03:54 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On
On 13 March 2016 at 01:25, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>>> version of the tools under:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>> version of the tools under:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
>>
>> My attempts of preserving the hist
On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
> version of the tools under:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
>
> My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully since
> private and public
To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
version of the tools under:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully since
private and public are two different SVN repos (you can't just svn cp/mv).
I don'
Christopher wrote on 2/4/16 7:25 PM:
> It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
> under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
> the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
> license on software which is expecte
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> a podling recently asked me why:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
>> are o
On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> a podling recently asked me why:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
> are only available to commiters. I see
> no reason why, but
so what do I do and how?
please advise me Otto.
On 2/4/2016 7:25 PM, Christopher wrote:
It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an op
It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
restricted
Hi!
a podling recently asked me why:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
are only available to commiters. I see
no reason why, but of course I'm appreciative
of the warning here:
https://svn.ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
