(Moving general@incubator and dev@community to BCC since this is really
a legal question about ASF licensing)
tison wrote on 5/1/24 11:25 PM:
Hi,
IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
that constructs the final software.
However, projects may also create
Hi,
IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
that constructs the final software.
However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it
appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms may
not be applicable)? Or what licenses
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:07 AM Kelly Oglesbee
wrote:
>
> I have a lot of apache licenses on my mobile device, but they have no
> copyright name copyright year...
Note that an Apache License does not necessarily mean the
corresponding project is an ASF project. Many other op
I have a lot of apache licenses on my mobile device, but they have no copyright
name copyright year, how do I utilize it these licenses and make them my own
work? I'm new and thinking of becoming a contributor, but I need to understand
what all these licenses are for before I continue to proceed
Hello to all the members of the community,
I hope this email finds you all well.
I am particularly interested in designing a license scanning function as it
aligns with my interests and skills. I believe that my proposal to design a
license scanning function will benefit the project by automating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17703021#comment-17703021
]
Zhenxu Ke commented on COMDEV-524:
--
Sounds like you want the `license-eye depend
che ShenYu Gsoc 2023 - Design license scanning function
> --
>
> Key: COMDEV-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-524
> Project: Community Development
>
SiYing Zheng created COMDEV-524:
---
Summary: Apache ShenYu Gsoc 2023 - Design license scanning function
Key: COMDEV-524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-524
Project: Community Development
IANAL but the Apache license allows you to do whatever you want with it
from what I know. You just can NOT call any derived work by the upstream
name or use the Apache marks, because your derived work is no longer an
Apache software. And you need to provide attribution with the software
you
Hello,
Has anyone from the Apache Org created an example on how to comply
with the license in creating a derived work? Perhaps some real source
repositories would serve as a good example. Does the Apache project
itself have some examples of project sources that comply with the
license but allow
turbaszek merged pull request #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/70
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Aditya-Kapadiya opened a new pull request #70:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/70
Changed HTTP to HTTPS for secure connection. The link redirected me to the
HTTP as HTTP is unsecure it can lead to a privacy issues or the user can become
a victim of MITM attack and can be vu
enses.
So, we learned from it, and like all OSS people liked, build a tool to make
daily life easier.
This tool is focusing on license header check/fix and dependency
resolving/analysis(Polishing) for Java/NPM/Golang
This project has been adopted by Java, Golang, Rust OSS projects in and out
of AS
Hello, while looking at your ASF 3rd Party License Policy page, I noticed there
was a typo under Category B. It says inducing when it should say including.
Just wanted to point it out incase you haven't noticed.
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#build-tools
z wrote on 2020-2-25 6:32AM EST:
> Hi all,
>
> I know this is a strange question, but what license are our ICLA and CCLA
texts available under?
> I am asking because I’m involved in a new Open-Source project which is
licensing it’s stuff under the Apache 2.0 license. Th
Christofer Dutz wrote on 2020-2-25 6:32AM EST:
> Hi all,
>
> I know this is a strange question, but what license are our ICLA and CCLA
> texts available under?
> I am asking because I’m involved in a new Open-Source project which is
> licensing it’s stuff under the Apach
r got a clear answer. I
think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is
that they do not have a license specified. That said, a LOT of
organizations have taken them and changed a few words, and we're
completely ok with that.
It's possible that our legal folks have
they do not have a license specified. That said, a LOT of
> organizations have taken them and changed a few words, and we're
> completely ok with that.
>
> It's possible that our legal folks have a more rigorous answer.
>
> On 2/25/20 6:32 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
On 2/25/20 10:12 AM, Lars Francke wrote:
This is a bit of a coincidence as I looked into this just today as well.
The CNCF is one of the organizations that seems to have taken the Apache
CLA: <
https://github.com/cncf/cla/pull/3/files#diff-04c6e90faac2675aa89e2176d2eec7d8
Yeah, OpenStack d
; FWIW, I asked this question years ago, and never got a clear answer. I
> think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is
> that they do not have a license specified. That said, a LOT of
> organizations have taken them and changed a few words, and we're
&g
FWIW, I asked this question years ago, and never got a clear answer. I
think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is
that they do not have a license specified. That said, a LOT of
organizations have taken them and changed a few words, and we're
completely ok with
Hi all,
I know this is a strange question, but what license are our ICLA and CCLA texts
available under?
I am asking because I’m involved in a new Open-Source project which is
licensing it’s stuff under the Apache 2.0 license. The project is organized
under a different freshly founded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb resolved COMDEV-290.
-
Resolution: Invalid
JIRA is not a playground
> License
> ---
>
> Key
Ray Nealey created COMDEV-290:
-
Summary: License
Key: COMDEV-290
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-290
Project: Community Development
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Ray
.com>> wrote:
> Hi All>
>
>
>
> Would some nice person be kind enough to point me in the direction of a
> Chinese (simplified) translation of the Apache License 2.0? I will be getting
> this reviewed by a Chinese lawyer, so would be happy to feed back any
> com
ebruary 28, 2018 2:20:45 PM>
> To: dev@community.apache.org>
> Cc: Nick Burch>
> Subject: Re: Chinese translation of Apache license 2.0>
>
> Andrew,>
>
> I presume you know that translating a license will open up a bit of a can>
> of worms. In particular
: Chinese translation of Apache license 2.0
Andrew,
I presume you know that translating a license will open up a bit of a can
of worms. In particular, it makes the license harder to work with in the
original jurisdiction and working out kinks in a new jurisdiction can be
really a lot of work.
Be
Hi Andrew, There is a Chinese article introducing, not translating, the Apache
Software License 2.0 in the open source governance document section on our
community website: http://www.kaiyuanshe.cn/article/5.mhtml.
This article, among other OSS licenses introduction articles on our website
time this is asked.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, 15:41 Andrew Katz wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Would some nice person be kind enough to point me in the direction of a
> Chinese (simplified) translation of the Apache License 2.0? I will be
> getting this reviewed by a Chinese lawyer, so would b
Andrew,
I presume you know that translating a license will open up a bit of a can
of worms. In particular, it makes the license harder to work with in the
original jurisdiction and working out kinks in a new jurisdiction can be
really a lot of work.
Be prepared to have not just one Chinese
Hi All
Would some nice person be kind enough to point me in the direction of a Chinese
(simplified) translation of the Apache License 2.0? I will be getting this
reviewed by a Chinese lawyer, so would be happy to feed back any comments they
may have about translation discrepancies (if any). I
K, which is not developed by Apache Software Foundation:
https://developer.android.com/
If some software is licensed as Apache license, version 2.0 aka
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html - then you can use it
for free and redistribute, provided you follow the Redistribution and
attribu
Good day
I 'm android developer and work for a direct sales company, I can use the
library for encryption SharedPreferences to store user data for free?
Thank you very much.
ignore my last email it doesn't matter I found it out it's proprietary and
apache
I was just wondering if I include some software which has an apache licence in
my software can I give it a proprietary, public domain or an apache license. I
haven't actually done any of this it's just for future reference.
On Friday, February 5, 2016, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> a podling recently asked me why:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
> are only available to commiters. I see
> no reason why, bu
No Worry have Test , will longer Test To Found all Parameters And Sound ,
really Great Sequenzer better Sound we By Any Apps i am use for Ableton live
this Sequenzer is The Best By live Play Ty Roman happy Weekend 👏
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 13.03.2016 um 03:54 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On
On 13 March 2016 at 01:25, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>>> version of the tools under:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>> version of the tools under:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
>>
>> My attempts of preserving the hist
ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
>>> the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
>>> license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
>>> restricted from redistribution. As such, it seems prud
h of those tools appear to be licensed
>> under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
>> the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
>> license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
>> restricted f
Christopher wrote on 2/4/16 7:25 PM:
> It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
> under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
> the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
> license on softw
reement that making this tool publically
>> available would be a 'good thing' ?
>
> Yes, there are caveats:
> - as I recall, the tools are not perfect, and have not seen any recent
> development.
> - is it safe to automate the update of license headers? This is
>
s, there are caveats:
- as I recall, the tools are not perfect, and have not seen any recent
development.
- is it safe to automate the update of license headers? This is
generally something that needs to be addressed file by file.
> 2. Who should bless the svn mv if we all agree?
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
open source
license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
restricted from redistribution. As such, it seems prudent to move them to a
more appropriate area. That's my opinion, anyway.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
a podling recently ask
It might be relevant that that both of those tools appear to be licensed
under ASL 2.0, which explicitly permits redistribution (presumably outside
the private area?). I would think it confusing to have an open source
license on software which is expected to remain private, or otherwise
restricted
Hi!
a podling recently asked me why:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl
are only available to commiters. I see
no reason why, but of course I'm appreciative
of the warning here:
https://svn.ap
eceive
> notifications.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sam.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ghamarjannah999 [mailto:ghamarjannah...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 4:50 PM
> To: Nitish Agarwal ; dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Enquiry for license
>
> g
.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 4:50 PM
> To: Nitish Agarwal ; dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Enquiry for license
>
> ghamarjannah...@gmail.com
>
> Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
>
> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >2
: Enquiry for license
ghamarjannah...@gmail.com
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
Hadrian Zbarcea wrote
>Hi,
>
>2. Apache Tomcat is free, and that's the only edition the Apache
>Software Foundation produces. There are no limitations.
>1. Your rights and obligations
ghamarjannah...@gmail.com
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
Hadrian Zbarcea wrote
>Hi,
>
>2. Apache Tomcat is free, and that's the only edition the Apache
>Software Foundation produces. There are no limitations.
>1. Your rights and obligations are clearly de
Hi,
2. Apache Tomcat is free, and that's the only edition the Apache
Software Foundation produces. There are no limitations.
1. Your rights and obligations are clearly defined in the license [1].
(Yes, you include Tomcat in a commercial application without any
financial obligation on
ghamarjannah...@gmail.com
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
Nitish Agarwal wrote
>Hi Team,
>I am developing an application where i want to use Apache tomcat and I
>need your help on following questions:
>1. My software/application is not free for users so can i use Apache
>tomcat
gt;
>Yes, as long as you give proper credit for that and respect trademarks
>- see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
>> 2. what are the limitations for free edition of Apache tomcat ?
>
>Apache Tomcat is free anyway, there are no limitations.
>
>-Bertrand
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Nitish Agarwal wrote:
> ...1. My software/application is not free for users so can i use Apache
> tomcat in that for free ?...
Yes, as long as you give proper credit for that and respect trademarks
- see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
ghamarjannah...@gmail.com
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
Nitish Agarwal wrote
>Hi Team,
>I am developing an application where i want to use Apache tomcat and I
>need your help on following questions:
>1. My software/application is not free for users so can i use Apache
>tomcat
Hi Team,
I am developing an application where i want to use Apache tomcat and I
need your help on following questions:
1. My software/application is not free for users so can i use Apache
tomcat in that for free ?
2. what are the limitations for free edition of Apache tomcat ?
In short i want to
I think this is the wrong mailing list.
Such questions are normally dealt with on
legal-disc...@apache.org
Hello Apache Foundation !
My question will be simple, on this page :
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa
you specify : “For any other type of CC-SA licensed work, please contact the
Legal PMC.”
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 international (
https://creativecommons.org
59 matches
Mail list logo
