Re: Automated ASF GPG signing

2016-02-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
It seems reasonable to me to tack code signing onto the end of CI builds from the likes of buildbot and Jenkins. You can then restrict your code signing service to the robots and avoid the pesky problems humans introduce into the process. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2/25/2016 1:57 PM, Christopher wrote

Re: Automated ASF GPG signing

2016-02-25 Thread Christopher
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:10 PM Shane Curcuru wrote: > Christopher wrote on 2/25/16 1:47 PM: > > I'm not sure where exactly this discussion should fit, but I know people > > have brought up questions about ASF-wide signing of artifacts before, so > > I'll just mention it on this list. > > > > Fed

Re: Automated ASF GPG signing

2016-02-25 Thread Shane Curcuru
Christopher wrote on 2/25/16 1:47 PM: > I'm not sure where exactly this discussion should fit, but I know people > have brought up questions about ASF-wide signing of artifacts before, so > I'll just mention it on this list. > > Fedora infrastructure has built a project called sigul: > https://fed

Automated ASF GPG signing

2016-02-25 Thread Christopher
I'm not sure where exactly this discussion should fit, but I know people have brought up questions about ASF-wide signing of artifacts before, so I'll just mention it on this list. Fedora infrastructure has built a project called sigul: https://fedorahosted.org/sigul/ which they use as part of the