On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/01/2014 04:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
>> go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
>> unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a f
On 02/01/2014 04:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a few questions:
1. I assume that I can wake up in the morning
Roman
You aren't the only big data reviewer. I at least an in there. I think that
the apparent solitude is a matter of labels. I labelled myself as mahout,
hadoop and zookeeper. You said BigData. Same thing. Different words.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 19:31, Roman Shaposhni
Re: Question 2
It was previously stated that people should review anything they have an
interest in
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201401.mbox/%3cCAD6
VreuUk=a5ggc2rtbu9ekjhiufma4eoxr5q4ssau3xmtg...@mail.gmail.com%3e) so
hopefully people who are reviewing anyway will revi
Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a few questions:
1. I assume that I can wake up in the morning (PST) tomorrow
and whatever is submitted is it. I
That's my understanding too. It should be easy enough to test this once i'm
not in an airport any more.
--
Rich Bowen, mobile edition
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Jan 31, 2014 3:30 AM, "Daniel Gruno" wrote:
> On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> > Out of interest do the speakers see the specific
On 01/31/2014 06:31 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
> reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
>
> Rob
As I understand it, speakers cannot see what reviewers write about a
talk, nor can you see what others write abo
Out of interest do the speakers see the specific comments individual
reviewers post or are these aggregated/anonymised in some way?
Rob
On 30/01/2014 04:40, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
>The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate
>more
>than that, email me. Or call me. I want
The system gives us accept/reject rankings. If you want to communicate more
than that, email me. Or call me. I want to have talk selections reflect the
opinion of the subject experts.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
On Jan 29, 2014 5:29 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
> Since this is my first
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2014 12:53 PM, "Kay Schenk" wrote:
> >
> > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
> >
> > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
> will
> > be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due dat
On Jan 29, 2014 12:53 PM, "Kay Schenk" wrote:
>
> As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
>
> The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications will
> be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of reviews?
As soon as possible. I dont have a be
Since this is my first time helping with the reviews,
I'm also wondering what's the objective for us
reviewers? Are we expected to stack-rank
the proposal in our given areas or weight them
somehow?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> As I am quite new to this proc
As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications will
be sent out by Feb 14. So, what is the due date for completion of reviews?
There are a few submissions -- aside from some standard ASF presentations
-- that are somewha
13 matches
Mail list logo