Thanks for this wonderful and wonderfully entertaining summary and some
great ideas.
-- Kay
___
Sent from MzK's phone.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 08:47 Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Here is a completely unstructured list of thoughts/notes from OSCON
> before I hop on the
On 02/22/2018 04:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
I've been invited to attend the first inaugural IBM's developer
conference here in SF: https://developer.ibm.com/indexconf/
I must say I liked it very much and one thing that jumped at
me was how OS community friendly it was. Basically a lot
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Harbs wrote:
> To me, subject tags are a partial (slightly annoying) solution to the
> problem. If there’s no better solution, then I suppose it could make things
> better, but it would likely require a lot of retraining of folks. I wonder
> how realistic that is.
On 01/31/2017 04:14 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
As Ted pointed out, it is an ancient symbol found in most Far East
mythology and the Hindu religion. "Out here" you will find it quite often,
on shops, temples and business cards. It doesn't "carry weight" unless it
comes in black on white, with the
On 12/29/2016 07:25 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Gavin Mabie wrote on 12/29/16 8:20 AM:
Hi Community
Should the community come out clearly rejecting the Trump xenophobic
policies? Given the fact that community members comprise all cultures,
religions and geographies?
Gavin
The ASF is a 501C3 no
Apache OpenOffice has had many problems with entities just "using" our
logos without permission. We have instructions for what folks should do
in the page we have on Trademarks.
It is possible to "steal" a png rendering without much effort but the
svgs are stored in a rather obscure svn area. When
On 06/13/2016 06:17 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 6/13/2016 4:45 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
Hi Everyone
I discovered Hipchat last week (well I knew Infra were using it!) but
found it to be quite a nice informal online environment.
I was wondering whether this could be a good way to bring toget
On 06/08/2016 05:09 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
Hi Everyone
Thanks very much for the feedback. I think this topic has a lot of
dimensions and it depends how far we want to go with it, and simple is
always a good place to start.
I'm still in the process of gathering feedback, from IT Womens Groups,
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 05/20/2016 03:02 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> > Will the board consider it, is an appropriate question here?
> >
>
> Community development activities have been delegated to the ComDev PMC.
> There's no reason for the board to consider it.
>
[top posting]
Super! and I look forward to seeing how this evolves.
On 02/07/2016 08:01 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi ComDev folks! Ramblings incoming :)
>
> As an aside to the 'Guiding volunteers' thread, I was talking with Rich
> (Bowen) while he was at DevConf this weekend, and we got to think
On 07/09/2015 12:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There
> have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release
> that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2.
>
> How do we get the changes from
It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There
have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release
that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2.
How do we get the changes from trunk into the 410 branch easily?
It seems we could use --
svn copy
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 19/04/2015 Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>
>> Thanks Andrea. I don’t see them there yet, so maybe they are
>> still delayed. Do you know how I can check if they are delayed,
>> or if I simply uploaded them wrong?
>>
>
> For the ACEU1
sorry for this post -- wrong "dev" list
On 03/22/2015 02:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> GTK is enabled by default for our builds.
>
> I don't see this listed as a build requirement for either Windows or
> Mac, however. So, should this build flag be changed to non-enabled
&
GTK is enabled by default for our builds.
I don't see this listed as a build requirement for either Windows or
Mac, however. So, should this build flag be changed to non-enabled
generally and only enabled for Linux?
--
-
MzK
apologies! posted to wrong list!
On 03/03/2015 03:14 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Do we have any further information on moving ooo-extras (backups of
> external libraries) or any extras to SourceForge and what form this
> might take? Latest discussion --
>
> http://markm
Do we have any further information on moving ooo-extras (backups of
external libraries) or any extras to SourceForge and what form this
might take? Latest discussion --
http://markmail.org/message/xfiafpfvhvbe4tiv
We've updated at least 2 libraries already and more will likely be needed.
In the
We had an update to our BZ instance about a month ago. In all honesty, I
didn't give the update a thorough review.
Now, I see that our Release Blocker button, and Request Review button
seem to be missing.
Can someone else confirm this? or is it just my situation. Thanks.
--
-
VERY good! :)
On 01/16/2015 09:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think Bertrand’s document is coming along nicely.
>
> This is half serious and half for fun, but while it will be great to have
> a maturity model and top-level authoritative documents on the Apache Way,
> to me, what would also help is
Does anyone know where I can find information on where actual keyboard
shortcut definitions -- the actual escape sequences -- are defined for
use in OpenOffice. I found an old thread on where the menus are defined
-- the *.xcu files -- but the not the actual ascii sequence assignments.
--
--
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > over at the Apache Commons Project, we have a long discussion about our
> > mailing lists. Are they to noisy? Should they be splitted up into
> sublists?
> > Shoul
On 01/15/2015 02:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> ...QO30 - do we really want individual projects to have / advertise
>> their own ways to take security reports?...
>
> We do not want that, agreed, but as I want the model to be usable by
>
h is next years. Can we get the LF folks to add
> the year to those event titles in the CFP system to make the two events
> actually distinguishable?
>
> Rob
>
> On 24/11/2014 00:30, "Kay Schenk" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 11/22/2014 09:16 AM, Rich B
On 11/22/2014 09:16 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> The CFP for ApacheCon Austin closes on February 1st, so we have just
> over 2 months to get our content solicited for that event. I need your
> help.
>
> At ApacheCon EU this week, I spoke with a number of project PMCs. I
> requested that they attempt
On 11/18/2014 09:46 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
>> At first glance, a big +1. This is one of the better Code of Conduct
>> policies that I've seen.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18
On 11/14/2014 02:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Two questions --
>> Are we ready to go ahead with these changes to /main/external_deps.lst --
>
> No we aren't! Roberto sent us a proof of concept, but he wrote that even
> the URL will change,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 29/10/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>
>> Here we go, the new look&feel based on some of your earlier feedback:
>> http://sourceforge.net/directory/apache_extras
>>
>
> This is much improved, thanks Roberto! The landing page is now much
Thanks. Very instructive.
On 08/05/2014 06:49 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> For those thinking about how to make it easier to new comers into your
> projects, and get them to stay, you may find this review article
> (especially section 3) of interest:
> http://www.igor.pro.br/publica/papers/
On 07/25/2014 03:36 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Pierre Smits <mailto:pierre.sm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I agree. The only link on the front page (homepage) of apache.org
> <http://apache.org> that
> comes in t
y, do not
keep up with this, but I'm sure someone does. So, I would propose an
"Events" page to keep tract of some of these. "ApacheCon" would, of
course, be one very important event.
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > Some of us j
Some of us just received a nice little summary from Melissa on the ASF's
activities at OSCON -- kudos to everyone on all this!
However, on looking at the ASF main home page, http://www.apache.org/,
events of any kind are not easily found. I'm wondering if a prominent
"Events" tab might be in order
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Thank you all for your enormous help so far. I can still use some help if
> we're going to make a *July 15th* deadline for CFP notifications. Here's
> what you can still do:
>
> The spreadsheet is at *http://tm3.org/aceu2014tracks*
>
>
> * Check
On 06/30/2014 09:11 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I need to call on all you find people who have offered help with
> ApacheCon. I didn't get anything done on it this weekend, and I don't
> want to be holding anybody up. These are the things that I can use help
> with.
>
> * Reviewing talks - if you're
On 06/30/2014 02:06 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 06/30/2014 05:03 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> * Sorting into tracks/categories. All of the talks are in a Google
>>> Doc at
>>> >https://docs.google.com/a/rcbowen.com/spreadsheets/d/
>>> >1NSFxoGYk
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I need to call on all you find people who have offered help with
> ApacheCon. I didn't get anything done on it this weekend, and I don't want
> to be holding anybody up. These are the things that I can use help with.
>
> * Reviewing talks - if
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Kay Schenk"
Date: Jun 20, 2014 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: Apache@ OSCON question
To:
Cc:
Thanks Dennis. I didn't even think to look at JUST the expo hall fee. So,
this will help in seeing if we have interests from volunteers.
At any rat
On 06/20/2014 10:29 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> OK, I'll ask about this. I think OpenOffice does have some popular items
>> that have been used at other events.
>
> It's out of stock and needs redesign. But we could at least redesign th
minutes that Apache has applied for a booth
> > at OSCON.
> >
> > Can we get a small update on this? Should projects provide give-aways of
> > some sort if we have them? What's typically handled at the Apache booth
> > at OSCON.
> >
>
--
Kay Schenk@Apache OpenOffice
“Things work out best for those who make the best of how things work out.”
-- John Wooden
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:51 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> > On 21/05/2014 jan iversen wrote:
> >>
> >> It would also be nice to hear a keynote about "who are we today", we all
> >> know our "own" projects, but currently ASF consist of soo
On 02/14/2014 06:03 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On 14 Feb 2014, at 14:39 pm, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 02/13/2014 06:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, jan i wrote:
Especially for the community track a panel discussion, with a short
introduction from each panel memb
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2014 11:57 AM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused as to what the current status is on the track
>> selection for ApacheCon NA. I've seen the proposed tra
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Melissa Warnkin wrote:
> It's a google doc, so the changes should have been saved immediately, no?
>
>
>
Well in an ideal world, yes...I
>
>
> ________
> From: Kay Schenk
> To: dev@community.apach
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2014 08:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> I'm going through the reviewed talks and marking things as "yes" and "no"
>>&
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'm going through the reviewed talks and marking things as "yes" and "no"
> in http://tm3.org/cfpreview/ based on their average score. I would
> appreciate if someone would go through the CFP site and mark a line in some
> way if that speaker i
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2014 01:54 PM, jan i wrote:
>
>> On 10 February 2014 18:10, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/a/rcbowen.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=
>>> 0ApZdtCkHHRUMdEx3YXRjTWd5Q1YtR2NRaFhwZ0xvNGc&usp=sharing#gid=2
>>>
>>> These are th
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> If you'd like to help with the CFP process (in addition to, or instead of,
> reviewing talks) one thing you can do is help me to categorize talks by
> track. I have roughly 100 talks that I'm not sure where they go.
>
> If you'd be able to help
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 02/01/2014 04:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Ok, so we're almost at the finish line as far as review submissions
>> go. At this point my dashboard is saying: "You have 191 proposals
>> unreviewed.". This is pretty good, but raises a f
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2014 12:53 PM, "Kay Schenk" wrote:
> >
> > As I am quite new to this process, a few questions --
> >
> > The closing date for submissions is Feb 1, and it seems notifications
> will
> &
ut it might be
advantageous in some situations to get input from multiple reviewers.
ok, that's it for now...
--
-----
Kay Schenk, Apache OpenOffice
"Cats do not have to be shown how to have a
49 matches
Mail list logo
