Most/All Camel Extra committers/contributors would like to move to GitHub
and consider SF as "dead end" and not "state of the art".
Best,
Christian
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Should all *-extra projects from Apache Extra mov
+1
Christian
-
Software Integration Specialist
Apache Member
V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
Apache Incubator PMC Member
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> De
I can do the review for Apache Camel.
Best,
Christian
Am 12.12.2013 20:53 schrieb "Rich Bowen" :
> Dear PMCs,
>
> In the coming days, we'll be hearing more about ApacheCon 2014, and what
> we need to do to make it happen.
>
> This time around, we, the folks at the ASF, will be responsible for
> s
Hadrian, thanks for the excellent summary.
Best,
Christian
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I though Ross was very clear in his explanation, but apparently not...
> **Unfortunately this thread (happens too often
> at the ASF) is digressing into hypothetical, vague and p
I follow the exchanges with great interest.
To make a few things more clear:
- All Camel extra components are optional and we do not
deliver/release/deploy it with our normal Apache Camel releases (and we do
not plan to do this).
- As package name, we use org.apacheextras.camel.xxx
- As Maven grou
Hello!
A few day ago, I started a thread [1], mainly because we wanted to forward
our Camel Extra [2] commit and issue notifications to our regular Camel
mailing list. We had some issues with this and asked INFRA for help. Now we
realized, there are different understandings what we can do (allowed
