On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 22:19, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
>
> you're right, I don't remember why it made sense to list these more than 10
> years ago: it was there in the initial import
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=1651762
>
> it seems it's because it started by counting PMC cha
you're right, I don't remember why it made sense to list these more than 10
years ago: it was there in the initial import
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=1651762
it seems it's because it started by counting PMC chairs, with notions of TLP
and sub-projects...
nowadays it's
5 special committees are currently included under "open source initiatives".
I'm not sure these can be classed as such (and they are not included
in the total).
I think they should just be dropped: do they play any part in the rest
of the site?
Also, the 300+ number looks wrong, because the numbe
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 04:54, Herve Boutemy wrote:
>
> there is a question of nice communication/marketing vs strict accuracy
> and always this "project" term that is unclear (as in
> https://www.apache.org/#projects-list )
>
> in index page:
> - 2 top graphs being about committees are accurate, o
