Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers released March 15 (based on RC1) have been accepted.
3 “+1” binding votes received:
- Jarek Potiuk (binding)
- Ephraim Anierobi (binding)
- Kamil Breguła (binding)
1 "+1" (non-binding) vote received:
- Josh Fell
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/rwf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Gruno closed COMDEV-434.
---
Resolution: Fixed
The underlying issue has been addressed upstream.
I've taken the opportunity to upd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17509290#comment-17509290
]
Everly Precia Suresh commented on COMDEV-438:
-
Hi [~panjuan] ,
I am Everly ,
Lillopplllopoplllpolplkllklppo lol lllopoo
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022, 5:04 AM tison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I notice the SPDX identifiers format defined by the Linux
> Foundation for machine
> processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers
> that are here available:
> h
rlenferink merged pull request #73:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/73
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
Or after?
Gary
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022, 09:10 Willem Jiang wrote:
> According to the example of SPDX ID[1], if we want to adopt the SPDX
> ID, we may need to add a comment line in the file header just like
> below
>
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
>
> I think we can add it before the Lic
According to the example of SPDX ID[1], if we want to adopt the SPDX
ID, we may need to add a comment line in the file header just like
below
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
I think we can add it before the License header of Apache.
Just my 2 cents.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
We
Both SPDX identifier (short form) and full boilerplate can be used to apply the
Apache License. And because ASF has our own specific template that is related
to our use of a CLA, so we required ASF projects to use this specific one[2].
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonglun Zhang updated COMDEV-448:
-
Description:
h3. *Apache ShenYu (incubating)*
A High-performance,multi-protocol,extensible,respo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonglun Zhang updated COMDEV-448:
-
Description:
h3. *Apache ShenYu (incubating)*
A High-performance,multi-protocol,extensible,respo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonglun Zhang updated COMDEV-448:
-
Summary: Apache ShenYu: add logging-kafka plugin (was: Apache ShenYu: add
logging-kafka plugin f
Hi,
Recently I notice the SPDX identifiers format defined by the Linux
Foundation for machine
processing of license information based on the SPDX License Identifiers
that are here available:
http://spdx.org/licenses/.
I can see that all of Apache project use it's own License header
template[1] an
12 matches
Mail list logo
