+1
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:53 AM Joan Touzet wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Bertrand.
>
> Mailing lists can be just as exclusive as semi-synchronous environments.
> They may not work for your community, but they work for ours, and removing
> them will necessarily disadvantage many contributors
Thanks for the info, Bertrand.
Mailing lists can be just as exclusive as semi-synchronous environments. They
may not work for your community, but they work for ours, and removing them will
necessarily disadvantage many contributors.
I'm firmly of the opinion that you can't completely ignore rea
Thanks for sharing that Bertrand - it was a good read - and easy for you
to share because it was discussed publicly on a mailing list :)
On that thread as well there was also a lot of support for a
discourse-based forum too which can be a nice happy medium offering the
advantages of a mailing lis
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:46 PM wrote:
>
> ...[ASIDE] Realtime communications are not inclusive...
FWIW there was a good discussion about this recently in Apache Arrow:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8433cda04dc9e1d6bb235e4f29bde30d07c3e5d81177af785af177f2@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
-Bert
With an individual is alt comfort , he/she will open up more about what's the
matter at hand.As to where when discomfort plays an isolater in the matter
,causing isolation to hide yourself from even inquiring the subject .All
questions are important, So are experiences, & the best & correct way
It is anonymous unless you give your name and email at the end.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 01:00 Andrew Palumbo wrote:
> I went to finish that tonight. I stopped; found it too peraonal.
>
>
