On 12/14/2017 5:41 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
I’m slightly confused. I think you are saying that you want to split off, and
do a “Barcamp” (or whatever we call it:), separate from AC as Rich Bowen is
planning? I’m a bit -1 on that, a big driver for getting people to both
“Barcamps (Summits in my
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/12/2017 02:18 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>> On Dec 12, 2017, at 6:34 AM, Kevin A. McGrail
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2017 8:26 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Unclear what distinction you're making here. Apachecon is of course short
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Kevin A. McGrail
> wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2017 9:12 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> ApacheCon will still exist. That is certainly the plan. The board approved a
>> substantial amount of money for ApacheCon to continue to exist.
>>
>> What's frustrating to me is all the
I don't remember any but it's possible that there are permissions/restriction
issues.
Though when I connect I use my ASF email address, I don't have any ASF related
permission checked (I'm a member) and I don't use my ASF wide password
Wait, I just noticed that you speak about
https:/
On 12/14/2017 9:12 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
ApacheCon will still exist. That is certainly the plan. The board
approved a substantial amount of money for ApacheCon to continue to
exist.
What's frustrating to me is all the people spreading the message that
ApacheCon is no longer going to exist. Th
On 12/12/2017 02:18 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
On Dec 12, 2017, at 6:34 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/12/2017 8:26 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Unclear what distinction you're making here. Apachecon is of course short
for "apache conference". The brand has a following.
The distinction is I am
