Yes, this has been mulled dozens of times over the years, and this "if it
didn't happen on mailing list it didn't happened at all" is the bottom
line. Note; the maturity model doesn't mention mailing lists, other than
footnote 11 talking about what happens outside public space.
However, one person
2015/8/11 上午1:40於 "Benson Margulies" 寫道：
>
> Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from
line0928769...@gmail.com?
2015/8/11 上午7:26於 "Marvin Humphrey" 寫道：
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:42 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > A moderator could unsubscribe them...
>
> I wonder if a moderator has approved their messages and added them to
> the "allow" list. We could detect that case if the culprit is
> subscribed to dev-allow@
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:42 AM, sebb wrote:
> A moderator could unsubscribe them...
I wonder if a moderator has approved their messages and added them to
the "allow" list. We could detect that case if the culprit is
subscribed to dev-allow@community but not dev@community.
I'm trying to under
2015/8/11 上午5:17於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
>
>
> 2015/8/11 上午5:16於 "Eduardo Enocia" 寫道：
> >
> > Sent from my ALCATEL one touch Android.
> > On Aug 7, 2015 6:13 PM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote:
> >
> > > We use it to communicate with people in all parts of the world. US,
South
> > > America, Several European
> > > count
2015/8/11 上午5:16於 "Eduardo Enocia" 寫道：
>
> Sent from my ALCATEL one touch Android.
> On Aug 7, 2015 6:13 PM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote:
>
> > We use it to communicate with people in all parts of the world. US,
South
> > America, Several European
> > countries, Asia. So I'd say it's pretty global.
> >
>
Sent from my ALCATEL one touch Android.
On Aug 7, 2015 6:13 PM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote:
> We use it to communicate with people in all parts of the world. US, South
> America, Several European
> countries, Asia. So I'd say it's pretty global.
>
> Uli
>
> On 06.08.15 19:24, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
林晉樟 於 2015年8月11日週二 2:26 寫道：
>
>
> Marvin Humphrey 於 2015年8月11日週二 1:45 寫道：
>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>> > Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from
>> line0928769...@gmail.com?
>>
>> Yes. This list seems to receive a lot of attention from spam
Marvin Humphrey 於 2015年8月11日週二 1:45 寫道：
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from
> line0928769...@gmail.com?
>
> Yes. This list seems to receive a lot of attention from spammers. I
> suspect that those emails origin
HI,
> On 10 Aug 15, at 14:10, Ajoy Bhatia wrote:
>
> Just wanted to make a comment on the mail from Louis Suárez-Potts <
> lui...@gmail.com>, in which he related his conversation with James H., a
> Slack engineer. Comments are inline below. Highlighting is mine:
>
> So, I pinged the nice folks
Ajoy Bhatia 於 2015年8月11日週二 2:11 寫道：
> Just wanted to make a comment on the mail from Louis Suárez-Potts <
> lui...@gmail.com>, in which he related his conversation with James H., a
> Slack engineer. Comments are inline below. Highlighting is mine:
>
> So, I pinged the nice folks at Slack (and the
Just wanted to make a comment on the mail from Louis Suárez-Potts <
lui...@gmail.com>, in which he related his conversation with James H., a
Slack engineer. Comments are inline below. Highlighting is mine:
So, I pinged the nice folks at Slack (and they really are nice!, or at
> least the guy I com
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from
> line0928769...@gmail.com?
Yes. This list seems to receive a lot of attention from spammers. I
suspect that those emails originally had binary attachments which have
been stripped
2015/8/11 上午1:42於 "sebb" 寫道：
>
> Yes.
>
> A moderator could unsubscribe them...
>
> On 10 August 2015 at 18:40, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> > Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from
line0928769...@gmail.com?
Yes.
A moderator could unsubscribe them...
On 10 August 2015 at 18:40, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from
> line0928769...@gmail.com?
Is everyone else seeing endless copies reflected from line0928769...@gmail.com?
2015/8/11 上午1:38於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
>
>
> 2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
> >
> >
> > 2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015/8/11 上午1:35於 "Benson Margulies" 寫道：
> > > >
> > > > I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> > > > have handled this issue over time.
> > > >
>
2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
>
>
> 2015/8/11 上午1:35於 "Benson Margulies" 寫道：
> >
> > I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> > have handled this issue over time.
> >
> > The absolute requirement is open decision-making. Avoiding real-time
> > communications avoids many
2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
>
>
> 2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" 寫道：
> >
> >
> > 2015/8/11 上午1:35於 "Benson Margulies" 寫道：
> > >
> > > I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> > > have handled this issue over time.
> > >
> > > The absolute requirement is open decision-making.
2015/8/11 上午1:35於 "Benson Margulies" 寫道：
>
> I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> have handled this issue over time.
>
> The absolute requirement is open decision-making. Avoiding real-time
> communications avoids many possible failures of open decision-making.
> (
I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
have handled this issue over time.
The absolute requirement is open decision-making. Avoiding real-time
communications avoids many possible failures of open decision-making.
(Not, of course, all.) After all, the simplest primrose
Steve Rowe 於 2015/8/11週二 0:21 寫道：
>
> > On Aug 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:48 AM, jay vyas
> wrote:
> >>> ...1) We have to trust PMCs to foster a healthy and transparent
> ro
Jay Vyas 於 2015/8/11週二 1:00 寫道：
> A great offset to the **true danger** which is "Real time closed door
> communication" is "Real time open communication.".
>
> This gives the open source engineer a defensible reason to be transparent
> tell "we can easily have this discussion in the community".
A great offset to the **true danger** which is "Real time closed door
communication" is "Real time open communication.".
This gives the open source engineer a defensible reason to be transparent tell
"we can easily have this discussion in the community"
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Ma
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:43:39AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>
> > If Slack could be configured to send a periodic transcript to the project’s
> > dev mailing list, problem solved, no?
It only works to the extent that summaries are then a
Marvin Humphrey 於 2015/8/11週二 0:43 寫道：
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>
> > If Slack could be configured to send a periodic transcript to the
> project’s dev mailing list, problem solved, no?
>
> No. People in out-of-the-way time zones are excluded when issues are
> worked
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> If Slack could be configured to send a periodic transcript to the project’s
> dev mailing list, problem solved, no?
No. People in out-of-the-way time zones are excluded when issues are
worked out during rapid-fire discussions. So are hobbyis
On Monday, August 10, 2015, Steve Rowe wrote:
>
> > On Aug 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > > wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:48 AM, jay vyas > wrote:
> >>> ...1) We have to trust PMCs to foster a healthy and tra
> On Aug 9, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:48 AM, jay vyas wrote:
>>> ...1) We have to trust PMCs to foster a healthy and transparent roadmap.
>>> Exclusive cliques and backchannels should n
29 matches
Mail list logo
