RE: Moving Apache Extras

Assigning admin rights to PMCs is part of the transition isn't it? You didn't actually answer my question, so maybe my assumption was incorrect. If this is ongoing work then we need to be clear on what ComDev is signing up to here. For PMC mails I was just thinking of a blanket mail to all PMCs

Re: Moving Apache Extras

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thanks Daniel, > > Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense. > > By "delegating read/write access to the new repos" do you mean the ComDev > owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the > relevant PMC upon r

RE: Moving Apache Extras

When the time comes please make the request through whatever channel is needed. We won't remember requests coming in right now. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roger Whitcomb Sent: ‎7/‎9/‎2015 2:01 PM To: dev@community.apache.o

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: >>> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way >>> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this >

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: >> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way >> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this >> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way > that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this > intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in > there instead of "PMC", and when I r

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing that verbiage, I thought there was

Re: Moving Apache Extras

Definitely need admin rights to the new Pivot-Extras for the Pivot PMC. Thanks, ~Roger Whitcomb Apache Pivot PMC Chair > On Jul 9, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > Thanks Daniel, > > Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense. > > By "delegating read/write access to the new

Re: Moving Apache Extras

Okay, that's fine. Thanks. I'm sure I can find stuff in the archives. I just wasn't sure what the final reasoning was. NBD. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > That discussion has been had a number of times. We're not open

RE: Moving Apache Extras

That discussion has been had a number of times. We're not opening it again since we are ready to pull the trigger on SF. The archives have the discussion (sorry, not got the time to search them and find links right now). -Original Message- From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]

Re: Moving Apache Extras

It seems to me that moving to GitHub would be easier, since Google put a "Export to GitHub" button on each project page, and I've used it and it works well. Perhaps I missed it, but was there a reason why SourceForge was chosen over GitHub? (Just curious... since I have no personal stake in this en

please ignore, wrong list! Re: How to commit changes to 410 branch?

On 07/09/2015 12:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There > have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release > that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2. > > How do we get the changes from trunk into the

How to commit changes to 410 branch?

It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2. How do we get the changes from trunk into the 410 branch easily? It seems we could use -- svn copy

RE: Moving Apache Extras

Thanks Daniel, Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense. By "delegating read/write access to the new repos" do you mean the ComDev owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the relevant PMC upon request. If that's the case then the ComDev PMC as a whole can own

Moving Apache Extras

Hiya folks, I'm the "lucky person" in charge of moving the some 350 projects from Google Code to SourceForge. This will happen over the course of next week, save some freak accident occurs, however, SourceForge is not Google Code, and as such, there are a few things we need to consider: - I

Re: Q: Is Apache Open Office a 501 c3 charity

Niclas Hedhman wrote: Did you forget Kevin's email address? Perhaps a separate forward... I took care of forwarding earlier today. But thanks for noticing, I often miss it! Andrea

Re: Q: Is Apache Open Office a 501 c3 charity

Did you forget Kevin's email address? Perhaps a separate forward... // Niclas On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Apache Open Office by itself is a project within the Apache Software > Foundation. > The Apache Software Foundation has 501 c3 status as per